Diesel
Referee
- Messages
- 24,281
That was good PVL, what metrics do they want?
That was good PVL, what metrics do they want?
He didn’t mention PVL or NRL. Disappointing , as a war of words with PVL would be fun.Touché although I’m pretty sure media deals are done on the back of viewership numbers and not crowd figures
He didn’t mention PVL or NRL. Disappointing , as a war of words with PVL would be fun.
Also the AFL clubs (except GWS/GC) actually make more money from crowds than broadcast revenue. That is their key metric. It is all about stadium deals for them. Different model to NRL so hard to compare.
I don't see any problem with the Maccas ad.Is it worse than Vlad in a Maccas advert? lol
Source?Could have sold it for more elsewhere.
Just this.I'm all for the NRL maximising the TV Deal.
You're happy to pay more for the same service?Just this.
It won't cost a arm and a leg to have two streaming services.
You're happy to pay more for the same service?
"Let's grow the game... By increasing the cost barrier to enjoy it".
If it helps the game i love continue to grow and fulfil its potential.You're happy to pay more for the same service?
"Let's grow the game... By increasing the cost barrier to enjoy it".
You're happy to pay more for the same service?
"Let's grow the game... By increasing the cost barrier to enjoy it".
The AFL receive just under half their revenue from broadcasters.What stadium deals do the likes of The Kangaroos or St Kilda have ? I’m a little dubious… both these teams get massive hand outs from the AFL every year on top of the salary cap … there wouldn’t be a need for that if they were living off their crowds
Afl gives them cheap rent at marvel stadium so the asset then doesn’t generate great returnsWhat stadium deals do the likes of The Kangaroos or St Kilda have ? I’m a little dubious… both these teams get massive hand outs from the AFL every year on top of the salary cap … there wouldn’t be a need for that if they were living off their crowds
St Kilda in 2024 had $59mill revenue of which $21.3mill was grant money from AFL. ie 36% of revenue.Afl gives them cheap rent at marvel stadium so the asset then doesn’t generate great returns
Taking st kilda 43 percent of their total revenue comes from the afl via a tv grant
Compared to a small nrl club like the sharks 40 percent of their revenue comes from the nrl via tv grant
For a big nrl club like the broncos it’s under 25 percent
Many afl clubs are reliant on supplementary grants which the stronger clubs don’t receive and without which the clubs would go broke
If the afl adopted the nrl system of all clubs receiving the same grant then their league would consist of 12 clubs
All their clubs in nsw and qld plus some Melbourne clubs
That should cover the remaining racism scandals, but why spend on that if Eddie is going to come in and create more from the top.They've got a $100million+ a year cash revenue boost this year from media deal, going to be interesting to see how and where they spend it.
They can knit a tarp sized rug to sweep any further rascism scandals under. It’s what they do best.That should cover the remaining racism scandals, but why spend on that if Eddie is going to come in and create more from the top.
Well I guess the concern is that you may have to pay for foxtel plus a streaming service or two, rather than replace it