You did say this on Feb 20 2020:
Using a brl brand is just going to put offside the grassroots support for a second club that isn’t keen on the broncos. Unless the new club is going to be largely reliant on pokie revenue from a LC then it has to have a broad enough appeal to get 25k members and 20k plus crowds if it has any hope of competing against the biggest club in RL on its doorstep. It’s best, and probably only hope is to either be a broncos city wide clone or a strong regional population identity. Calling it North Brisbane something’s but owned by Redcliffe playing out of Suncorp or a South Queensland something owned by Ipswich etc.
this requirement to still be reliant on LC’s rather than the nrl supporting the growth remains the biggest difference to afl expansion model and why we will always struggle to move beyond our traditional boundaries.
I fear expansion will never happen in my lifetime. I helped Flo and David Fairleigh with the Central Coast Bears bid. Between 2010-2013 no bid got close to the CCBears. Then in 2014 the NRL said that they would not look at expansion until all of their existing clubs were financially secure...
forums.leagueunlimited.com
Dolphins drew 30k members with an average attendance of 32k at Lang Park. They're a traditional BRL club. You predicted they wouldn't be able to to draw 25k members and an average attendance of 20k unless they were based out of Lang Park as a Broncos clone or under the name North Brisbane.