Put up or shut up, ASADA.

[blacktip-reefy]

Absolutely.

 

[coolumsharkie]

Drug wise, no idea. But if they cheated they deserved to be outed.

fixed


You are so right!!

 

[carcharias]

Wow
So now they are going to decide ?

"Clusterfark " I think is the correct definition?

 

[Card Shark]

So Andruska , once aware of the leaks called in Deloittes & AFP to find the leaks.
This says one thing to me. The media reports were accurate.
it also says mountains about somebody I thought was a scumbag left leaning political animal. Good on her

Which "somebody" are you referring to?

Someone within ASADA was leaking info, it's blatantly obvious.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Which "somebody" are you referring to?

Someone within ASADA was leaking info, it's blatantly obvious.

Cant you read what has happened?
ASADA werent leaking the information. Andruska knew this was going to be said about the organisation whilst under her watch.
So the feds were called in. Deloitte for forensics.
surely is dead right. Somebody who "held a position" was teh one leaking.
ASADA have been cleared, it wasnt them. Who got ASADA's information? Who had much to gain with the paper talk?
2 people. One party.

 

[Surely]

Zachery

 

[Generalzod]

Asada what kinda of an organization is it whan the person in the centre of these events hasn't even been interviewed by this mob, so much for Asada and it's so called powers.


ASADA probe ends without Stephen Dank's input:

The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority has completed its investigation of the AFL and NRL without speaking to Stephen Dank, the central figure in the drama at Essendon and Cronulla.
Dank, the controversial figure who oversaw the supplements programs at the Bombers in 2012 and Cronulla the previous year, told Fairfax Media on Wednesday he had not been contacted by ASADA officials.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...danks-input-20140226-33is0.html#ixzz2uT99ff2e

 

[Card Shark]

Cant you read what has happened?
ASADA werent leaking the information. Andruska knew this was going to be said about the organisation whilst under her watch.
So the feds were called in. Deloitte for forensics.
surely is dead right. Somebody who "held a position" was teh one leaking.
ASADA have been cleared, it wasnt them. Who got ASADA's information? Who had much to gain with the paper talk?
2 people. One party.

Ok, gotcha.

What I meant by ASADA leaking is they must've told someone who told someone leaked the info. The persons you mention would've had the right to obtain the info & the reason to broadcast it.

 

[Quigs]

or phone hacking.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

or phone hacking.

Yeah, good call techno whizz.
Maybe you could detail how that is done, with each service provider in Australia? I'd be very interested in hearing this as I am a keen techno security follower.

 

[Quigs]

Yeah, good call techno whizz.
Maybe you could detail how that is done, with each service provider in Australia? I'd be very interested in hearing this as I am a keen techno security follower.

Youse will have to wait until me and 'me' best mates the QC, and the State Wide Manager of a large Banking Corp are having our morning coffee with.

I'll get back to 'youse'

(pssssts, I say, I say, the kids as sharp as a pound of wet leather)

 

[blacktip-reefy]

So you dont know if it is possible to phone hack in Australia?

 

[Quigs]

or phone hacking.

Did you miss your morning coffee with your best friends this morning Comrade Reefy?

So you dont know if it is possible to phone hack in Australia?

Come in Spinner, Head'em up

 

[Surely]

Imagine that pollies using the sharks to keep their own bad news out of the press.

 

[coolumsharkie]

Andruska said former Federal Court judge Garry Downes would assist the authority in this process. "His role largely is to look at the evidence we have and to determine from his position whether or not the evidence is sufficient to take cases forward."

hahaha fa faaahk saaaaake. How can you take cases forward without interviewing the main player?? Won't stand up in court if infraction notices are issued somehow.

Unbelievable.

 

[Blues Riff]

"Dank, the controversial figure who oversaw the supplements programs at the Bombers in 2012 and Cronulla the previous year, told Fairfax Media on Wednesday he had not been contacted by ASADA officials."

If he told the media that, then it must be true.

 

[carcharias]

So, can someone (smarter than me .. if possible ) please answer this question.
Does the Club and coach and all those people involved have a case for defamation should this ASADA stuff come to nothing.

I am not an expert on the law...obviously.
However ....I am not alone when I say I find it extremely odd that they didn't interview Danks.
To me that says
1) they do not have enough evidence and can only abandon the entire thing
or
2) The actual law somehow lets them suggest/get blokes convicted without needing a positive blood/urine tests or questioning the main player in all of this.

 

[webShark]

So, can someone (smarter than me .. if possible ) please answer this question.
Does the Club and coach and all those people involved have a case for defamation should this ASADA stuff come to nothing.

I am not an expert on the law...obviously.
However ....I am not alone when I say I find it extremely odd that they didn't interview Danks.
To me that says
1) they do not have enough evidence and can only abandon the entire thing
or
2) The actual law somehow lets them suggest/get blokes convicted without needing a positive blood/urine tests or questioning the main player in all of this.

Dragging this on for over 12 months and no one found guilty probably done more damage than a few bans a year ago.

Essendon paid a fine they can afford. Got an acceptable replacement coach. No player bans. Facing upcoming season with some optimism. Contrast us.

 

[Quigs]

So, can someone (smarter than me .. if possible ) please answer this question.
Does the Club and coach and all those people involved have a case for defamation should this ASADA stuff come to nothing.

I am not an expert on the law...obviously.
However ....I am not alone when I say I find it extremely odd that they didn't interview Danks.
To me that says
1) they do not have enough evidence and can only abandon the entire thing
or
2) The actual law somehow lets them suggest/get blokes convicted without needing a positive blood/urine tests or questioning the main player in all of this.

Don't worry Carch there are a lot of brilliant Criminal minds in our very own forum. And some have some very high profile contacts.

I am sure someone will answer your question soon.

It might not be correct but someone will.

 

[Card Shark]

Yeah we can sue the pants off them...& they must give up their first born daughter, upon turning 16, if not already. ;-)