++ Gregos v.4
Bench
- Messages
- 2,966
You know some of the boys night be concerned about the balance of proof required in the civil jurisdiction.
What do they say about sleeping dogs?
What do they say about sleeping dogs?
Do you think any of the Sharks players, took, inadavertantly or purposely, something that was directly named & banned by name , by WADA?You know some of the boys night be concerned about the balance of proof required in the civil jurisdiction.
What do they say about sleeping dogs?
This is the first solid shot they have got on dank
And should make us sharks supporters concerned
I am. Despite our case being different to Essendon's, there will be many calling for the exact same penalties.
The telegraph will lead the charge!
I think it's pretty clear to see what essendon are doing.....
Angling for 6 months bans due to ignorance on the legality of the substance...... After all legal proceedings are wrapped up it should be about 3 months down the track putting the ban commencement date around october.
At worst the players will miss a few rounds at the start of next season.
If the evidence is irrefutable, we should be putting ourselves in a position to do the same if need be. Maybe we are?!
haha..f**king ev ....That was my bux night man ....
I was just about in the fetal position by the end of the night with the amount of shit I copped ..... lining up at the troughs etc was brutal .... Us sharks fans are horrible people - i like it!
haha..f**king ev ....That was my bux night man ....
I was just about in the fetal position by the end of the night with the amount of shit I copped ..... lining up at the troughs etc was brutal .... Us sharks fans are horrible people - i like it!
firstly the amino acid was not banned by name when essendon took the amino acid.
ASADA is claiming it falls under its catch all. ie. tear drops of fairys are banned..