Nonsense post
lots of words no argument
Just because you don’t understand the post evidently.
Nonsense post
lots of words no argument
Even better ask them to sacrifice their little club for expansion and it’s a hard no
What’s funny is when you ask Perth fans to justify it over nz2 or Brisbane 3 and they go all quiet and can’t
Essentially they want a Perth team in because one day in the future they might benefit the code whilst clubs that can benefit code now should miss out
sure if the code goes to 24 teams there’s a place like a filler club like Perth
It is either orIt is not an either/or. Sometimes you just have to take a longer term view on things. Also there aren’t many sides that would benefit the code now or in the future - you have picked perhaps two of the three.
Also there isn’t a chance in hell (well not much chance) we are getting to 24 teams. We are not America.
And then they took a vote to kick them outThey wanted a Sydney club either way, they entertained starting a new one - https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/125641831
Key quote:
They knew they could admit a South Australian team easily into the VFL/AFL, however they could see the future potential of the Sydney market for Aussie Rules and wanted a team there for that reason.
No one is arguing that those clubs or small clubs shouldn't be in the NRL though, so you don't have a point.
It’s easy to justify- large, growing population, favourable migration trends, captures a niche in a new market, gets advertisers seen across the continent and internationally in NZ and can play in favourable time slots for tv. An Australian market of a projected 3.5 million people is an easy sell.What’s funny is when you ask Perth fans to justify it over nz2 or Brisbane 3 and they go all quiet and can’t
Essentially they want a Perth team in because one day in the future they might benefit the code whilst clubs that can benefit code now should miss out
sure if the code goes to 24 teams there’s a place like a filler club like Perth
These are all red herrings. All you have to ask yourself is this: has it worked for them or not. Weighing up all the positives and all of the negatives of that decision and regardless of the circumstances in which that decision came about - have they benefited from it or have they not.
Now I would not think there would be anybody around (heck you might be the first I have come across) who doesn’t think that them going to new markets hasn’t benefited them
I think they would be paying an a fair bit more yes. I think you’d be daft to say otherwise at this point.
Having a presence in a market is worth something. Having no presence in a market is worth nothing.
My rebuttal to those people is if they think Perth is so important then they should send their club over there. It's hypocritical for people who support teams from regions with less than 300k people to argue that we should choose Perth over Christchurch due to the former having a bigger population. If their club was punted between 1998-2000 based on population size they would have screamed bloody murder, but because they're now safe they think they can be hypocritical.What’s funny is when you ask Perth fans to justify it over nz2 or Brisbane 3 and they go all quiet and can’t
Essentially they want a Perth team in because one day in the future they might benefit the code whilst clubs that can benefit code now should miss out
sure if the code goes to 24 teams there’s a place like a filler club like Perth
Didn't the SANFL stand in the way of Adelaide fielding a team in the VFL?They wanted a Sydney club either way, they entertained starting a new one - https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/125641831
Key quote:
They knew they could admit a South Australian team easily into the VFL/AFL, however they could see the future potential of the Sydney market for Aussie Rules and wanted a team there for that reason.
BingoMy rebuttal to those people is if they think Perth is so important then they should send their club over there. It's hypocritical for people who support teams from regions with less than 300k people to argue that we should choose Perth over Christchurch due to the former having a bigger population. If their club was punted between 1998-2000 based on population size they would have screamed bloody murder, but because they're now safe they think they can be hypocritical.
Perth having 2m people doesn't mean shit when there's not enough active RL supporters amongst them to prop up an NRL team.
They’re the ones who applied for the licence.Didn't the SANFL stand in the way of Adelaide fielding a team in the VFL?
It’s impossible to justify over Christchurch or Brisbane 3It’s easy to justify- large, growing population, favourable migration trends, captures a niche in a new market, gets advertisers seen across the continent and internationally in NZ and can play in favourable time slots for tv. An Australian market of a projected 3.5 million people is an easy sell.
It’ll require work, but expansion can’t just be about getting an immediate sugar hit, there has to be long term planning involved too.
I found this on the Crows' site.They’re the ones who applied for the licence.
They've got about 16-23k fans who actively attend matches and another 33k who watch them on 9Gem. That's with the morelldt dominant sports team in the country over the last 25 years. God help them if they ever become strugglers.Bingo
let’s look at Melbourne
they would be lucky to have 70k active fans in Victoria
it’s a tiny nieche
Perth could have 4 million people league would still be tiny
$700 mill revenue v $1bill revenue is all the evidence I need as to why the nrl need to be a proper 20 team national competition.These are all red herrings. All you have to ask yourself is this: has it worked for them or not. Weighing up all the positives and all of the negatives of that decision and regardless of the circumstances in which that decision came about - have they benefited from it or have they not.
Now I would not think there would be anybody around (heck you might be the first I have come across) who doesn’t think that them going to new markets hasn’t benefited them
I think they would be paying an a fair bit more yes. I think you’d be daft to say otherwise at this point.
Having a presence in a market is worth something. Having no presence in a market is worth nothing.
2mill people+ and tipped to hit 3.5millIt’s impossible to justify over Christchurch or Brisbane 3
As you’ve said weagles and dockers are massive2mill people+ and tipped to hit 3.5mill
highest income and spare cash in the country
major corproates in the city
76 year RL history
Supportive govt
3500 jnr rl players
new market with new customers
takes the fight to union and afl
good time slot for new tv game
doesnt compete for sponsors and fans with existing nrl clubs
Of the 28 RL clubs in WA, only 42% of them are based in Perth.As you’ve said weagles and dockers are massive