I think people are romanticising Slater a bit. He is still a gun, but he is not the same bloke that terrorised the Blues in the early years of Qld's streak.
Are you actually mentally challenged?Only 20% of the turnaround needed to win game 2 will come through changes. More important is the remaining players except Gagai to play better. Get them to Watch a tape of game 3, 2015 and copy that defensive intensity. NSW had their arrogant tails up after winning game 2 and the previous series. We came out in the third game and brutally hit with the shoulder all the 80 min. Most of the players are still there, even if getting older.
Are you actually mentally challenged?
Only 20% of the turnaround needed to win game 2 will come through changes. More important is the remaining players except Gagai to play better. Get them to Watch a tape of game 3, 2015 and copy that defensive intensity. NSW had their arrogant tails up after winning game 2 and the previous series. We came out in the third game and brutally hit with the shoulder all the 80 min. Most of the players are still there, even if getting older.
this gagai to centre thing is making me laugh. just replacing one defensive liability with another.
why the f**k are they and others here suggesting moving their most consistent performer out of position? centre is different to wing. in attack, he'll find less space and see less ball as he won't be bringing it out. in defence, Hayne will just go through him. by all means do it QLD, but it is a dumb move.
better off switching chambers to the right side where he plays for Melb with Cronk. consider Boyd as a centre on the left inside Holmes or Oates. not a fan of FBs playing there, but f**k there are 2 for NSW anyway and they're all better than gagai in defence.
context. out of position for QLD. it's where he's played well for them last series and in game 1.How is gagai going to be out of position when he plays there for his club?
its not about the scoreline in the game i suggested. it did blow out but the way they defended. lots of comments by the commentators in the call of that game about how the qld pack hit with the shoulder cleanly instead of the wrestle. and all this after nsw had lifted and dominated in game 2 and made qld look like were getting old and the dominance was possibly over. bit like just now. nsw couldnt have changed anything from this last decade from watching a win. the only difference that could have been made with hindsight would be flicking bozo ten years earlier.Haha I had a laugh at that comment to, lucky the blues never watched game 3 2000 or the last 10 yrs would have been a bit different.
The ruck nonsense, or lack of it from QLD, was a huge factor. I was amazed watching how poor QLD were in this area compared to the previous years when they were allowed to do almost anything to the tackled player and for as long as they liked.
And where did I say it was the ruck that gave QLD dominance???
The ruck nonsense, or lack of it from QLD, was a huge factor.
Are suggesting it was not a part of the game in which QLD clearly dominated over the years Greasy?