perverse
Referee
- Messages
- 26,715
At a club that didn't have its head firmly implanted up its arse, there might be some effort to partner Mullen with a half that compliments his shortcomings. There are very, very few halves that are the complete package with the ball in hand. You point out a few things he's not great at, and fair enough - we all know his short kicking game is lousy - but why is it Mullens responsibility to be good at absolutely everything, and not the clubs responsibility to plug holes in our roster?Swarzey.
Mullen would do well in the Storm system next to Cronk.
But not as the main playmaker.
Mullen has good long kicking game but his attacking kicks are average at best.
He puts up terrible bombs, he struggles to get repeat sets. Every now then he does put in a good little kick for Uate.
He has a beautiful right left to pass but hardly uses it. But apart from that his passing game is solid at best.
I'd still take him over Hoddkinson as Mullen is more talented.
In saying that if the scores were tied, give me Hodkinson.
Mullen has always struggled with this part of the game.
Our clubs (and some fans, it would seem) answer to EVERYTHING halves related for the past 7-8 years has been "Mullen has to do it". Why can't the answer be something more reasonable like "ok, Mullen does this, this and this... we need to find a halfback that can do that and that to compensate"? I just don't f**king understand why we even bother discussing Mullen, when there is always an imposter like Tyrone Roberts next to him. The answer is get another half that can do the things Mullen can't. It seems very obvious, but apparently criticizing Mullen is just easier.