True, But is there not a rule in place where you can't use video of other incidents at the judiciary, something like every case is different?If I was the Dragons they have got enough examples after origin and a couple of other NRL games to build up a portfolio of examples next time to fight a Rava charge for what he lost at the judiciary last time
If you cannot use video as evidence of other incidents then what evidence is there that can help in any situation? I'm sure that even in the hearing they use video of the tackle so that they, the judiciary panel, can show the person charged why they think the tackle was illegal.True, But is there not a rule in place where you can't use video of other incidents at the judiciary, something like every case is different?
I thought i read this somewhere a couple of years ago.
I agree Gareth. Rava has improved his skills quite a lot in the past couple of years but these suspensions will have an impact on how he will tackle front on in future as he will be tentative with them. So when he returns, all eyes will be focused on his tackles by all and sundry. Not a nice feeling to have I'm afraid for him and us fans.The situation with Rav and tackles which have been worst than our blockbusting winger is ridiculous to say the least .
And of course the 9 commentators silence about them , is the epitome of double standards .
Just leaves me seething , knowing full well that Ravawala will only need to look at an opponent the wrong way in the future and he will surely be penalized for it .
This has all the hallmarks of another Craig Smith scenario - penalize the bloke out of the game , he is playing for the wrong team .
I agree Gareth. Rava has improved his skills quite a lot in the past couple of years but these suspensions will have an impact on how he will tackle front on in future as he will be tentative with them. So when he returns, all eyes will be focused on his tackles by all and sundry. Not a nice feeling to have I'm afraid for him and us fans.
Cause you can. Obviously last trial they did not deem there was enough but because we’ve been focusing on it since then I’ve seen a few now that I would be presenting next time roundTrue, But is there not a rule in place where you can't use video of other incidents at the judiciary, something like every case is different?
I thought i read this somewhere a couple of years ago.
Right on Gareth!Couldn’t agree more Dave , I don’t mean to come across as being one-eyed , but I can guarantee you that if he was playing in a jersey of one of the more prominent clubs that all of this would had blown away long ago .
I think quite a lot of us has seen shoulder tackles by other NRL players since Rava's last suspension. There have been numerous in fact. Not sure if for the time being that Rava is serving his penance that the officials are taking much notice of them and they are just waiting for Rava to come back and charge him again and say that "we thought that this type of tackle had disappeared but we now find it has returned and therefore we will charge Ravalara for his careless shoulder tackle on.... penalty 5 weeks ".Cause you can. Obviously last trial they did not deem there was enough but because we’ve been focusing on it since then I’ve seen a few now that I would be presenting next time round
I think it’s called the prowler tackle, whatever it is it should have been penalised.Ado Carr got hit with a full on shoulder charge to the kidneys last night with only one arm very belated wrapping, left arm stayed down from my view. This was much worse than Rava‘s tackle around the legs and suspended for 4 weeks. Said before I hope our club has sent a respectful but assertive representation to the NRL On this matter and then will share any reply to us fans.
BTW being a bit balanced the maroons back rower may have thought ‘ if I go around the legs it may be a cannonball charge’. However, under the parlance developed years ago when Craig Wing playing for roosters got hit hard in back; became known as ‘the creeper’ tackle ( someone may correct me).
Yes, I still find it very hard to accept the seeming disinterested 5 minute guilty judgement to Rava‘s powerful low tackle; only to see a number of similar looking tackles go without charge. Really unjust. Is a 5 minute cursory judgement really proper natural justice and good faith in carefully considering evidence? I’m not a lawyer so someone might help me understand it all. The only comment I saw was the judiciary judged that the arm wrap was ‘belated’.
That makes them unaccountable, the NRL is an evil tyrant.True, But is there not a rule in place where you can't use video of other incidents at the judiciary, something like every case is different?
I thought i read this somewhere a couple of years ago.
Love the wrapping motion of his armsSo Mel take Ponga out of the game, no pen, nothing.
Rava would get a year for this.
Watching it live I missed it, but the replay shows he stepped into Ponga.
Disgraceful.So Mel take Ponga out of the game, no pen, nothing.
Rava would get a year for this.
Watching it live I missed it, but the replay shows he stepped into Ponga.
I honestly feel sick every time I think of Ravawala suspensions. They are targeting him and he seems like a clean skin, enjoys his footy and plays tough. Very very sad. Makes me angry actually