bartman
Immortal
- Messages
- 41,022
the ticket has made it clear that this isnt about Fitzy necessarily, it is about CHANGE.
The ticket had better think twice about allowing Josh Massoud to misrepresent them then, or about allowing his photographer access to their meetings... because they could be losing votes they will need with every article.
People who are anti-Fitzy to that extent will automatically vote for any alternate ticket, in the name of change at any cost.The telegraph has siezed teh Fitzy agenda for their own and the ticket is happy for the exposure to enable them to shine a light on certain concerns....
The people they need to convince (through exposure) are the people who might want change, but want to know what it is first. I suspect most people in this bracket (myself included) know that Fitzy cannot be ousted as such, and actually want to know this ticket's realistic plans for what they will do if they gain election to the Football Club board.
That message is there in parts, but is being swamped through their "partnership" with Massoud, and his lack of journalistic skill in representing what you are saying is the ticket's real agenda. He's just a scummy journo, just tell him what you want written, or shut him and his photographer out :lol:.
Last edited: