perverse
Referee
- Messages
- 26,715
it's hard to say. masterful troll or complete dunce?There are only two possibilities, Razor is either mentally impaired, or deliberately trying to bait everybody.
you decide.
it's hard to say. masterful troll or complete dunce?There are only two possibilities, Razor is either mentally impaired, or deliberately trying to bait everybody.
I thought Spitting was worse than Punching. Just because he missed him doesn't mean the INTENT wasn't there, (in many criminal circumstances intent is enough to create a conviction, even if no act is committed). Stop twisting facts to suit your side of the story.
"50 players have been in trouble over 100 years of Rugby League" "90% of players in trouble have done worse than Latu" (Both of these are quotes from you)
Who are the 45 players who have done worse things than Latu? (name 20 even)
"Women are physically equal to men"
Why are men's world records in sporting events better than women's?
Don't hold your breath. He has already been online today and posted in other threads but will ignore posting in this one again.
Schifcofske not taking anabolic steroids
HE WASN'T AIMING AT HIM - HE WAS 20M AWAY. HE WAS SPITTING ON THE COURT - SAME AS MANY PLAYERS DO.
He didn't. He took steroids - huge difference.
AAP Sports News (Australia)
03-28-2001
RL: Factbox on rugby league players banned for drug use
SYDNEY, March 28 AAP - Factbox on rugby league players suspended for drug use.
MARK GEYER: Suspended for 10 weeks for testing positive to a recreational drug - 1992.
ROBERT TOCCO: Served an eight-week suspension after testing positive to the use of
anabolic steroids - May 25, 1994.
CORIN RIDDING: Suspended for 22 matches (later reduced to 16 matches on appeal) after
he admitted he took anabolic steroids while playing for the Western Reds in 1995 - February
18, 1996.
CLINTON SCHIFCOFSKE: Confirmed he had tested positive to anabolic steroids
Depends on the sport
Name 1 of those players who tested postive to performance enhancing drugs who was charged by the police. The cocaine users were.
which cocaine users were charged?
McGuiness and Field were
No it's up to the person who made the claim to provide the evidence. Salivor made the claim, it's up to him to prove it.
If I go to the press and say Timmah still wears nappies. It's up to me to prove it, not up to you to disprove it.
The person who makes the claims provides the proof
The CRL will make no further comment relating to Field, who was yesterday charged by police, as the matter is now before the courts.
Stop beating around the bush. You claimed 90% have done worse then Latu. I named 7 players who have been busted for drink driving (which you admitted counted as a player 'misbehaving'). That means there has to be more then 60 incidents worse then Latu to justify your 90% statement. You don't even have to name them. Just answer this, do you think there's been more then 60 incidents worse then Latu's? And don't dodge the ****en question this time. It's a simple yes or no.I've named some for you earlier in the thread.
Depends on the sport
There are 2 sources saying he took anabolic steroids (El posted 1 and I PM'd you 1). You have sweet **** all evidence (as usual).He didn't. He took steroids - huge difference.
It's a low act to hit a woman, even lower to hit a pregnant one.
It's a low act to hit anyone. Hitting a woman is no worse than hitting a man. It's people that use the "Woman are weak" line that are the reason woman struggle so much. They're just as capable in everyway as men are. It's your attitude which is the reason woman aren't paid as much as men. Bosses think "Well the public thinks women are weak. This job requires someone tough who can argue for the best deal possible. Men are far more capable, as woman are weak and can't defend themselves". The "Women and children first" line is an insult to all women implying they're as weak as children, and men are better able to handle not going first. It's a disgusting attitude to have.
Hitting children and the disabled are much worse than hitting an able-bodied adult. But women and men are equal and just as capable in every way.
??? Usually women are weaker physically than men and that's why it's a lower act.
It's a low act to hit anyone. Hitting a woman is no worse than hitting a man. It's people that use the "Woman are weak" line that are the reason woman struggle so much. They're just as capable in everyway as men are. It's your attitude which is the reason woman aren't paid as much as men. Bosses think "Well the public thinks women are weak. This job requires someone tough who can argue for the best deal possible. Men are far more capable, as woman are weak and can't defend themselves". The "Women and children first" line is an insult to all women implying they're as weak as children, and men are better able to handle not going first. It's a disgusting attitude to have.
Hitting children and the disabled are much worse than hitting an able-bodied adult. But women and men are equal and just as capable in every way.
No they're not weaker. That's a lie. Sure some women are weaker than some men. But some men are weaker than some women.
Women can be just as tough as men. The "Women are weaker" line is a lie spread by sexist organisations who use it as an excuse to pay women less than men for doing the same job.
No they're not weaker. That's a lie. Sure some women are weaker than some men. But some men are weaker than some women.
Women can be just as tough as men. The "Women are weaker" line is a lie spread by sexist organisations who use it as an excuse to pay women less than men for doing the same job.
No they're not weaker. That's a lie. Sure some women are weaker than some men. But some men are weaker than some women.
Women can be just as tough as men. The "Women are weaker" line is a lie spread by sexist organisations who use it as an excuse to pay women less than men for doing the same job.