emjaycee
Coach
- Messages
- 14,889
Expensive supersub but reward for his years of service and if we get Blaize for unders not too bad.No 14. Utility. Can fill 1,3,6,7 and if can play a little hooker perfect.
Still need to find a decent hooker though.
Expensive supersub but reward for his years of service and if we get Blaize for unders not too bad.No 14. Utility. Can fill 1,3,6,7 and if can play a little hooker perfect.
Expensive supersub but reward for his years of service and if we get Blaize for unders not too bad.
Still need to find a decent hooker though.
Maybe... but I am not 100% sure just yet.MA will be hooker
Maybe go a bit more old skoolI think u might scare only about 90% of the crowd lol
There is no doubt about that.Not at fullback for sure, although his defence has saved more than 1 game for us.
If only he had a brain. Dangerous!Simmonson caught Esra amd would of caught Walsh bar Esra shifting. He can motor.
Mate I reckon as a fullback with the individual brillance to change a game, he is not even in the top 10.There is no doubt about that.
He's no Bronco Reece though.
I'm not denying that.Mate I reckon as a fullback with the individual brillance to change a game, he is not even in the top 10.
But as a defensive fullback he is in the top 2 or 3 and as a fullback who can chime into the line and ball play, he is probably close to one of the top 3 or 4.
It's a balance.
It's tragic but I don't where Gutho fits in next year right now.I'm not denying that.
He's also a great leader.
He's just not a game winner.
He's getting older and slower.
We need someone more dynamic at the back.
I'd be happy for him to move to the centres, but a 9 he is not.
I wear thongs.Bringing out the big words tonight, put your resume in Brad will be after you.
But if you can tie up your shoe laces it’s a deal breaker.
He did.Your telling me the bunker missed the fact Mam changed his line after he passed the ball to Walsh to prevent simmonson the opportunity to run down Walsh.
He played a bit of FB as well. His old man was no slouch either.I liked how we was developing into a centre last year, but to be honest I prefer him on the wing which is where he has played 80% of his first grade football.
A manufactured centre from a winger, thanks to Waqa falling off a cliff.
91 first grade games in his career. 63 on the wing, 19 in the centres. (4 at fullback and 5 off the bench for Raiders).
Yeah let's not move the Penis to accommodate Blaize. If fullback is going to be his spot he can spend some time on the wing with the training wheels on.If Gutherson plays on in 2025... what do people think about:
1. Gutho
3. Lomax
4. Talagi
6. Brown
7. Moses
11. Penisini ?
Agree, we still need a decent hooker...
The PO turned out to be worthless, so there was close to zero risk. It wasn't a choice between a PO and a two year contract. The player didn't want to be locked into the second year on unders.They should have backed Blaize in until 2025 without any clauses and told Issac to get stuffed not many other clubs would have given an unproven 18 year old a PO.
No. Penisini is not an edge forwardIf Gutherson plays on in 2025... what do people think about:
1. Gutho
3. Lomax
4. Talagi
6. Brown
7. Moses
11. Penisini ?
Agree, we still need a decent hooker...
No. Penisini is not an edge forward
Mate I reckon as a fullback with the individual brillance to change a game, he is not even in the top 10.
But as a defensive fullback he is in the top 2 or 3 and as a fullback who can chime into the line and ball play, he is probably close to one of the top 3 or 4.
It's a balance.
