Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
We had Russell and Simonsson both on too much to sit in reserve grade. Plus Dunster who is also no doubt on too much not to be in the NRL side. You merkins whinge about cap management and in the same breath show you know nothing about it.
Actually, you're the one trying to have arguments, with posters who suggested our attack wasn't good in the loss to the Bulldogs.
With the contract to suit that knowledge.
So your suggestion of a two year offer is meaningless.
lol nah it’ll be Brendan Hands
The alternatives all played 80 minutes in reserve grade a couple of days earlier.26 players and Asi played centre last weekend
This isn’t the appeal to authority you think it is.
These aren't the droids you're looking for... nice try, deflector boy
The point is you should only have 17 of them, at most. Dunster was a top 17 player when we signed him. The fact he suffered a catastrophic injury is just bad luck. It doesn’t mean we get to pay him less. We are stuck with him.
If our attack was good enough we wouldn’t have had to put ourselves under pressure to hold off the Bulldogs in the last 10 minutes. The game would have been over already. Don’t examine these things in a vacuum.
But the Bulldogs have the second best defence in the NRL. What were you saying about vacuums?
Good on them. They had less possession and a man sent to the sin bin for this game. Why aren’t you taking that into account? Do you think that happens every week? We were a team fighting for our lives and had our halfback and fullback back but couldn’t finish them off. We aren’t in a position ti be patting ourselves on the back because we played a brave Bulldogs team with the second best defence. We needed to win but came up short.
