Eelementary
Post Whore
- Messages
- 57,121
Yeah, I'm sorry - Canterbury defended well, and credit to them.
But this narrative that we had no problems with our attack is just insolent.
Last edited:
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Yep.
We signed Hopgood, Hodgson and Ofahengaue. Three decent players (one did his ACL five minutes after we signed him) and a few cheap depth players: Doorey, Murchie, Momoisea and Davey. They're a fair reflection of how much we had left in the cap.
We had a bunch of spaces free last year and still used 31 players in first grade. You're worrying about a non-problem. Anyone we sign at this stage of the season will be Lumelume quality. We might as well just upgrade him for the year.
The player they've signed for next year is no doubt pretty expensive. As for the rest of the roster, our gun SG Ball merkins from last year will be turning 20 and 21 next year. But the club isn't likely to announce their upgrades into the top thirty. Fans wig out when a club announces the signing of merkins they've never heard of.
We have the top tryscorer in the NRL. Has he scored a single try from a bomb?
He's an outside back that has been moved into the forwards.
On the other hand, we scored three tries in 70 minutes against 13 men. You take the good with the bad.
The game doesn’t go for 70 minutes. These arbitrary standards are meaningless.
We also scored 18 points in 80 minutes, more than the Dogs are conceding per game this year.
Are the Bulldogs giving their opposition 67% completions, 52% possession and a man in the sin bin every week?
Last time I watched them play they completed higher, had no sin bins, and we put four tries past them.
Hodgson was coming off a couple of injury-interrupted seasons at the Raiders and was clearly at the backend of his career. It was always a gamble of a signing. There was a reason that Ricky was happy to move on from him.
Yeah and that game demonstrated how poor our attack was as well. We had 59% of possession and won 26-8. You don’t see the forest through the trees.
www.google.com
We went for the player who would take a one year deal I reckon.
I cant be bothered reading what that car bonnet whacking muppet has to say.James Hooper had a blog. The kind where he answers answers live.
He went the full controversy to stir up interest.
Shock Ciraldo call that proved a masterstroke as clueless Eels exposed — Hoops
Ciraldo masterstroke that defied Bulldogs critics as clueless Eels exposed — Hoops
