BxTom
Bench
- Messages
- 2,674
I disagree with this Tom, the way a team performs for the most part is a reflection on how the coach has prepared them and got them motivated to play. So when they are out there giving away silly penalties and generally playing very poorly, the coach has to accept some responsibility for that.
On the flip side, I am happy with the win and happy with the come back but the simple fact is we should never have been in the situation in the first place to be down by 20 points playing Manly without DCE, Lyons, Matai and losing Nate Myles for the most part of the game. The best part of the game for me was seeing Nathan Cleary performing in such a manner considering he is 18 years old in his second NRL game.
Yes. the coach can prepare and motivate a team. A coach is also responsible for the game plan. But he cannot play for them. Was it Griffin that dropped the ball? Was it Griffin that gave Manly the ball 10 metres from our line? Was it Griffin laying all over the players? Were these the things that Griffin had in the game plan (other than perhaps slowing the play the ball down)? I don't think so.
My original post was a little tongue in cheek as a response to the people blaming him and calling for him to be sacked. These are largely the same posters that want new players every time we lose and then complain that we don't give our juniors a chance. Get a grip.
Tom.