Tries off kicks are still worth 4 points right?
And if you have the ability to (1) kick to a precise location (2) have the chasers there to pressure the catcher (3) have the skill to get the ball back and score from it, isn't that a valid form of attack?
Or should we just ignore that aspect of the game? Rep selectors always look for halves with a good attacking kicking game, why is that?
People are not ignoring this. They are suggesting that the only way we are able to score isnt off smart attacking play where we can open up a defense but off a lottery. You do understand the difference right?
Papali'i try was nothing planned or great. Just a casual bomb with a solid chase. The fullback decided not to try and catch it, the bounce favoured us. We scored.
Sivo try was a high ball, Blake being tall managed to bat the ball back, it got to Sivo and we score.
Worth the same points? Yeah sure are. But they are only scored with some element of luck to them and no real gaurantee it will work another time.
Very different then a grubber kick that catches someone out of position or for example JAC from 80mtrs out. They are smart plays. Well drilled.
Hoiking the ball high into the air and hoping for a favourable bounce or an opposition error isn't exactly rugby league. Its more a stain in our game if ask me. The only skill involved is the height and placement of kick. And yes this does require skill but its bloody boring and a shitty way to accumulate points if ask me.
If people are unable to see this then they are very one eyed.