Rd23 2024: 8pm Eels v Panthers GAME DAY THREAD @ Commbank Stadium Aug 9th

[Poupou Escobar]

But what if the PO (supposedly) reduced the cost of the contract (as you seem to always claim) that we're wasting on the declined benchwarmer?

The risk of the PO increases with the likelihood of the player activating it.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Gutherson also said, that's what happens when they don't like you.

Yep, referees panic when the underdog is winning.

 

[the phantom menace]

The risk of the PO increases with the likelihood of the player activating it.

And (obs) if you don't give a PO, the risk of it can never increase.

As discussed by many above and previously, there is no benefit to the club through a PO - with the high likelihood that the player would have signed for the offered amount anyway.

 

[Pazza]

And (obs) if you don't give a PO, the risk of it can never increase.

As discussed by many above and previously, there is no benefit to the club through a PO - with the high likelihood that the player would have signed for the offered amount anyway.

POs are a way of bring down contract values apparently

 

[King-Gutho94]

Gutherson also said, that's what happens when they don't like you.

Gough has been the ref in the Dogs, Knights and panthers losses this year.

Those 2 games Gutho and Moses clashed with him I don't think he is a fan of us.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

And (obs) if you don't give a PO, the risk of it can never increase.

If you don't give the player the PO he won't give the club a discount on his required salary. Ths is how commercial transactions work.

As discussed by many above and previously, there is no benefit to the club through a PO - with the high likelihood that the player would have signed for the offered amount anyway.

High likelihood is it? We should probably give them less money as well. I reckon there's a high likelihood that he would've signed anyway ffs

 

[Poupou Escobar]

POs are a way of bring down contract values apparently

Why else would clubs agree to them?