Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The risk of the PO increases with the likelihood of the player activating it.
But what if the PO (supposedly) reduced the cost of the contract (as you seem to always claim) that we're wasting on the declined benchwarmer?
Yep, referees panic when the underdog is winning.
And (obs) if you don't give a PO, the risk of it can never increase.
Gough has been the ref in the Dogs, Knights and panthers losses this year.
If you don't give the player the PO he won't give the club a discount on his required salary. Ths is how commercial transactions work.
High likelihood is it? We should probably give them less money as well. I reckon there's a high likelihood that he would've signed anyway ffs
Why else would clubs agree to them?
Lol. This is how poor commercial transactions work. See the clip Pazza posted above.
Just offer them what we're offering them, but without the player option. If they walk away because some other weak club offers them a player option so be it, and move onto the next one. At least then we will have decided that we won't stay a weak club into the future.
The tickets are free. Not sure about the rest.
