Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I meant only focusing on Haas. He’s got to have some awareness of the guy who actually has the ball. I’ll change it - his probable f**k up (although it could even be Moses’s’s) is communicating rushing the line up to Decore. Matto did the right thing rushing up, it meant their only options were for someone to take the dump hoping for a shit tackle or to throw a miracle pass. But as a team we f**ked up by leaving a gaping hole for Croft to stroll over
Dally Messenger was doing it in 1909.
If Andrew Ryan doesn't get held up at 18 nil we win that game.
Mick Vella was a god under that rule, and Brad Drew played like Damien Cook. Nek Minnett rule changes in 2002, gang tackling annnnnnnnnnnnnnd it's gone
Mick Vella was a god under that rule, and Brad Drew played like Damien Cook. Nek Minnett rule changes in 2002, gang tackling annnnnnnnnnnnnnd it's gone
lol i forgot i was once excited about that pairing. Oh to be young and carefree with no idea what the future held.
So much dissapoint, up there with Poore for our most underwhelming signings.
Is calling a Dyke a mincer sexist???? You might get cancelled Baz.
I've been called worse, by you even.
He could have focused on him while not getting too far out of the defensive line
Dykes was also great under that rule in 2001. In 2002 he joined Parra and the game no longer suited him. Much like Sandow's shoulder charge and Adam Ritson's brain cyst.Mick Vella was a god under that rule, and Brad Drew played like Damien Cook. Nek Minnett rule changes in 2002, gang tackling annnnnnnnnnnnnnd it's gone
There were three defenders outside Matterson and five attackers outside Croft. Matterson had to get up quickly (as did all of our edge defenders) to stop the ball getting out to the overlap.
