Dally M points
Moses - 6
Kelma - 2
Luai - 2
Iongi - 1
Hopgood - 1
based on that I’m entirely certain the judges didnt watch the game. Saw the headlines that Moses had a blinder and then just chose some other players for the minor points.
Kelma and Hopgood were not in the top 5 players in the eels team let alone in the game
Luai was absolutely ratshit. If anyone from the tigers deserved points it was May.
That is disgraceful. Whoever the two 'Experts' who came up with that should have a red-line put through them.
I'm in the minority but I have no problems with the 3, 2 ,1 voting system. Especially now where they have two sets of eyes watch over every game the system SHOULD work. We vote for the 3, 2, 1s in the forum and for the most part you usually get similar results.
However sometimes you have to question if they do even watch the same game? I mean Hopgood played 38 minutes yesterday and was hardly any better than solid in that stint. Luai was invisible the whole game. Kelma did well for his try but was pretty dogshit apart from that.
I'm pretty sure the 'Experts' get paid for their votes, so like the old days they should have to put their names against the game and it be public. But also they should have to submit it with a small blurb with a justification of why they voted for that player. It doesn't have to be a novel but for example:
Judge Lemon Squash
3 Points (Mitchell Moses) - Outstanding in his comeback game, 3 try assists, a 40/20, was composed throughout and took his opportunities when they presented. The whole team looked far better with him being there.