What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RD7 V Tigers ANZ Stadium

Messages
12,179
after the strong showing of the last 3 weeks we dish up that shite unbelievable
it might be good for us in the long run to get our heads down out of the clouds
 

Tony Bongo

Bench
Messages
3,006
I never thought the day would come where there is more diving in rugby league than the soccer. Not only that but the refs support it.
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,415
after the strong showing of the last 3 weeks we dish up that shite unbelievable
it might be good for us in the long run to get our heads down out of the clouds

I'm interested to see how we go now for the next 3 weeks. We could quite easily win 2 or 3, but we could also quite easily lose all 3 as well.
 

Fathead

Bench
Messages
2,777
as a benchmark... If we had played one of the better teams we would have been beaten by 50. It looked like we had been on the turps all week. Very poor
 

yy_cheng

Coach
Messages
18,734
Paulo was really crap today. The chip kick on the 1st to Sandow was a no no. He should've told Sandow NO.

Fui has lost speed and so not as effective.
 

Parra Pride

Referee
Messages
20,444
We certainly lost that game, but gee some of those calls didn't make it any harder for us to do so.

First bullshit call gets them in the position to score a try, second call gives us a no try that was given a try just a few days ago, then to top it all off full time get's blown AFTER time off was blown.
 

oldmancraigy

Coach
Messages
11,978
Agree Sandow was decent. It's his job to take risks, and sometimes they don't come off.

As for Hayne, he was entitled to expect there would be some merkin supporting him. We were lazy in our support play and lazy in our cover defence.

Stop being sensible. Hayne is more to blame for his offload than Sandow for his pass.

And if hayne had scored those 2 solo tries under the sticks, we would have won. Selfish mongrel was trying to make Sandow look bad.
 

yy_cheng

Coach
Messages
18,734
We could have but we didn't even win, to think we were going to flog them because farah is out is disrespectful to the blokes in the team that are winning games for them.

2 intercepts, missed goals, one obstruction try that where brooks had no way getting there that 24 pts there
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,992
Agree Sandow was decent. It's his job to take risks, and sometimes they don't come off.

As for Hayne, he was entitled to expect there would be some merkin supporting him. We were lazy in our support play and lazy in our cover defence.

He was entitled but they were setting up for the next play. Blair did the same for the Tigers. It's the simple stuff that needs to be addressed. Low percentage lays are what costs games and there were more made by the Tigers but ours cost us in the end.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
34,404
Seriously what the f**k is wrong with Sandow's kicking ? I have no confidence in him and the bastard is going to give me a f**king ulcer.
 

Daneel

Bench
Messages
2,581
2 intercepts, missed goals, one obstruction try that where brooks had no way getting there that 24 pts there
Could have been but wasnt. Thats football why not lose by 50 and say oh if the opposition didnt score them 10 tries we would have won.
 

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,193
We gifted the tigers two tries yet still scored 4 tries to 3. Our defence was strong. Yeah we made some errors but really we gifted the games to the tigers. There are areas for improvement but gee it aren't like we got flogged and the season is over.

The boys should be disappointed but how they react to the loss will say a lot about the character of the side.
 

yy_cheng

Coach
Messages
18,734
Could have been but wasnt. Thats football why not lose by 50 and say oh if the opposition didnt score them 10 tries we would have won.

I am just supporting Pou's point the that we SHOULD'VE thrashed them. We should've.

They were terrible and were knackered.
 

Wally21

Bench
Messages
4,432
The death riders on this forum are amazing...we lost yes, but we competed for most if the game. A decent kick was the difference in a game where the Tiges were the better team. I'm as dissapointed as the rest of you, but the death riding is toys out of the cot stuff.

Observations...
Chechin is not worth spitting on
sef paulo will always be rocks or diamonds but more rocks
Lussick should always start. He's a tough boy
We have the backs to compete with any side, but...
Our forwards are still our weak link
And the obstruction rule is an absolute disaster
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
79,048
Agree Sandow was decent. It's his job to take risks, and sometimes they don't come off.

As for Hayne, he was entitled to expect there would be some merkin supporting him. We were lazy in our support play and lazy in our cover defence.

oh bullshit - you don't just throw it to f**kin no one without looking .... it was one of the dumbest plays of the game - full stop, end of story
 
Top