I doubt relocation is the answer. I think joint ventures would do the trick with surplus licences being distributed to new ventures.
The Dragons and West Tigers have done their duty and gone through the pain so that the NRL could survive after Super League. Now it up to the untouchables to go through some pain:
Easts and Souths to become a joint venture - Sydney City
Parramatta and Penrith to become a joint venture - Sydney West
Canterbury and the West Tigers to become a joint Venture - Western Tigers
SGI and Cronulla to become a joint venture - called SGIC
Manly and Central coast to become a joint venture - Northern Sea Eagles
That leaves 5 licences to be distributed to 5 new clubs:
NRL
Perth
North Brisbane
Ipswich
Fiji
Sunshine Coast
New Canterbury Cup Clubs
Geelong
Christchurch NZ
New Guinea
Samoa
Tonga
Thanks for the post, well thought out even if I am not sure I agree.
5 teams in Sydney, 4 in Brisvegas, 2in Melbourne... maybe, but 2 in NZ first I think before Melboure. A team in Perth and nth qld, Newcastle... all good. Not sure if Fiji ranks higher than others like PNG and Tonga? But somehow we need to get there...
I have gotten to the stage that the region is less important than the club. I’m originally a saints supporter, but we are dragons now, and Illawarra is a founding member like the Saints. Once this happened I accepted it. And hate divisive comments. All that said, I’d prefer to relocate than merge again. A merger now would loose too much identity.
I would think fans may prefer a relocation rather than a merger? (I mean if it was one or the other which it must be for some teams I think). But I may be wrong.
A poll on how Dragons supporters view it Would be interesting.
Also, is 16 clubs all we can handle? Finances for 20 teams? In the long term? Or what’s the magic number? (We need that to identify the distribution).
Oh... and St George Illawarra Cronulla... that’s SIC mate!