Knight Vision
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,066
BJ has a knee injury apperently.
oK now I understand. He has been one of the form centres
BJ has a knee injury apperently.
Do we have a tonne of Kiwis in the side? That would explain it
Do we have a tonne of Kiwis in the side? That would explain it
God, how good is Sione going to be? I've probably only seen him play twice, and he was solid if not a little underwhelming... but geez he's having an accelerated career thus far.
I really ask this question in honest, how good is this guy? By all reports he's the second coming of Tahu.
The real issue is that we aren't willing to cut our losses with recruitment mistakes like a lot of other clubs do.
We'll hang onto Uate until the bitter end now and probably give him another contract.
Uate, jimmy mac, Gids and Boyd should be moved onto in an orderly process.
It's certainly ironic that we are complaining that we can't sign players and yet some of the players we have managed to hold on to that a lot of other clubs would kill for, we immediately want to flick whenever they're not in their absolute best form.
It's a youth thing. Anyone younger is automatically considered better even if they are playing in a much weaker competition.It's certainly ironic that we are complaining that we can't sign players and yet some of the players we have managed to hold on to that a lot of other clubs would kill for, we immediately want to flick whenever they're not in their absolute best form.
It's a youth thing. Anyone younger is automatically considered better even if they are playing in a much weaker competition.
Gidley is past his best obviously but has been quite good, as has Clydesdale. I'm happy with that rotation.
Boyd didn't even play that badly on Saturday, it's his attitude that most people have a problem with (and rightly so).
McManus & Uate should definitely be the first choice wingers. As good as Mamo is & is going to be he's still pretty green & did struggle to get involved on the weekend.
Uate's poor form has been exaggerated, sure he had a slow start to last year, but by halfway through he was playing a lot better than most on here remember.
That's not to say he was or is earning his paycheck, but getting worked up about losing promising juniors becausr of his pay packet, when most of us agree we have cap space coming out of our ears, is a getting a bit ahead of ourselves.
This is such a flawed argument. Long serving player allowance and marquee allowance are still "under the cap" - they are a part of the salary cap. If we weren't spending those on Gids, we could be spending more of it on Mullen at the very least - if not a few other of our blokes - and it would free up other money under the cap to work with. There is no "free ride" for any player under the salary cap. Gidleys salary is a waste no matter which way you cut it. It's ~$450k that we could be spending on a a quality player.I wouldn't say we're getting value for money out of Gids, but if he's the marquee player & a long serving player surely he shouldn't be on huge amount under the cap considering the allowances teams get for those type of players?