Jobdog said:
I would have thought it did tbh
Just because he signs for another team doesnt mean we didnt breach his contract.
I agree that he is not required next year, but we need to wait for a ruling on the matter before we think we are in the clear....
It will be a long time before it is resolved, as if we are in the right, then we will become like the NFL were no contract is secure, so players will chase signing bonuses over big salaries.
For the sake of the NRL, I think we need to be found guilty of tearing up a contract, otherwise it sets a precedent for the future of the games players.