What has he said that is so untrue?
Well, most of that list didn't actually have a purple patch ...
What has he said that is so untrue?
Well, most of that list didn't actually have a purple patch ...
With our main go to man being Hayne... having an organising halfback rather than a playmaker isn't a bad option. I'd expect Mortimor to take over the halfback role next year with KK playing five eighth. But Robson's experience, even though he's not played a lot of first grade, would come in handy even just at training and to help the younger guys out a bit. Let's keep in mind Robson has been coached by Des Hasler, and trained alongside Matt Orford so would have learned a lot from them, even though he may not be talented enough himself, he could have a few tips for KK and Morts just in regards to the leadership of a team.
Lowrie gets the ball more than INU.
However, on the rhs, Reddy gets it more than Benny or JoeyG.
Just a question guys, would you say our rhs centre/wing is performing better or the lhs?
Who's the half playing on the right and who''s the half playing on the left?
I'd say it's about equal - Reddy and Grothe on the right are scoring the tries, but Burty and Inu are making breaks and running rings around their opponents.
The first half of your post you were going really good,but when you said robson can teach morts n KK things i had to just stop reading. You cant be serious?the both of them have it all over him in half back play. They have vision/he dont/they have kicking games/he dont/they have running games/he doesnt..He has a good defensive game,thats all he has.
well eventually being the operative word, he was always a back up half who hit a purple patch for a couple of seasons and did well, that's what Robson is, that's what Blake green is, that's what Matt Head is, that's what Eddie Paea is and unfortunately for alot of you, that's what Tim Smith is....
People are too easily swayed by a winning team. If we were still losing Robson would be being savaged from pillar to post. Let's face it the reality is that he is a good defender but his attacking game is quite poor.
robson's kicking game is diabolical. winning a few games doesn't change that. it's still diabolical.
No. It isn`t too flash, but it`s not diabolical. He puts in some good kicks from time to time. He did a lovely kick on Sunday, into Grothe`s corner which, had it come off, would have been as good as anything Mortimer has done.
I think I`ve seen Mortimer on the left (Inu`s side) more often than Robson. But Robson plays both sides and is more often the first receiver.
People are too easily swayed by a winning team. If we were still losing Robson would be being savaged from pillar to post. Let's face it the reality is that he is a good defender but his attacking game is quite poor.
Burt`s making breaks and playing well. But, gee, Inu is disappointing me. I was a big Inu fan, but I`ve been waiting and waiting for him to show some real form. I`m even starting to agree with some people who kept saying he`s a winger not a centre. I`m frustrated every time he gets the ball. Maybe he`s not a centre. Maybe next year it will be Tahu and Reddy. But then we`d have three wingers - Burt, Gothe and Inu. I wouldn`t drop Burt or Grothe on this year`s form.
Umm....Robson does have a running game.
I think the problem with INU is that he is trying to do things himself rather than make proper use of his wingman.
Reddy goes himself but also creates for Grothe.
INU goes himself and if it doesn't succeed, he gets tackled with the ball.
Tahu was like that early on in his centre career.
Umm....Robson does have a running game.