NoSchitSherlock
Bench
- Messages
- 3,701
3. Housten penalised for retaliating to a Simona push
This started when Houston got a knee on the face. The penalty should have been for that.
3. Housten penalised for retaliating to a Simona push
1. Simona's pass for the brown try was forward
2. Degois penalised for making a takle. Ref has no clue, saying it was for holding down, then it was because he bit marshall in the head, then it was because of holding down again.
3. Housten penalised for retaliating to a simona push
4. Degois pushed down at marker by heignington allowing a clear path for farah, if degois was there putting pressure on, it goes back to lui, and theres a good chance he misses.
5. 9-2 penalty count...
6. Questionable obstructions/shephards on 2 of the tigers tries that denied defenders the oppurtunity to shut the play down. Both werent even reffered to the video, when in the case of the brown try, lyons said "check for obstruction..."
It did change the field position battle late in the game though. Technically it should have been a penalty to us, allowing gidley a chance to slot the 2 points.
HE HAS PLAYED 5 GAMES.One moment of good play is not good enough in 80 minutes football. Apart from setting up the Costigan try, he was terrible in defence, has a poor kicking game and wasn't sighted in attack apart from the Costigan try.
Roberts showed more in one game than Henry has showed in 5. Heavens for bid but Buck shows he is a class above.
HE HAS PLAYED 5 GAMES.
Jeez some of you blokes are harsh. Give the kid a chance; you are expecting johns like stuff from him it would seem. He would have trained off season with Mullen there. It would have been Mullen's job to take control and Beau could have played his own game. Injuries have forced him to step up much quicker than planed and play to Gidley's game which is not that of a half.
Only just got back from the game and although the result, our halves and the penalty count were incredible disappointing i'd rather just touch on how incredibly proud i am of the following forwards.
Tui, Hilder, Faas, AK, House, Nev, Eddie and Ike.
They ripped in and really smashed the tigers and showed a lot of grunt and heart. A real refreshing change.
Agreed. It was nice to see a lot of them step up. Tui and Faas are becoming more like a a genuine first grade forward duo each week.
Unfortunately by the end of the game though they were buggered and couldn't make the final hard yards. I believe Tui was on the bench near the end of game though?
Nah, I still think we'll have a red-hot go; just think our attack will be a problem ...
2 try assists now for Junior Sau![]()
Wow. Henry a long way off first grade standard defence. I see why Wayne is iffy about him.
I predict that stone will um and arh the whole way through the press conference
Lol. That's exactly what he'll do.
lets see who picks his cliches
I'll start with:
- It was a good game of footy, both sides tried hard and we just came up a bit short.
- Some of the calls were a little disappointing but we'll have a look at the tape during the week and speak with Bill.
Roberts showed more in one game than Henry has showed in 5.
Raymond said at halftime that Sheens wanted a slower play the ball and he got that on a platter.
It was made 10 times worse for the Knights as we got penalised in the ruck at the same time as the Tigers could do as they pleased.
i'd rather just touch on how incredibly proud i am of the following forwards.
Tui, Hilder, Faas, AK, House, Nev, Eddie and Ike.
They ripped in and really smashed the tigers and showed a lot of grunt and heart. A real refreshing change.
Any stats from last night?
Kaufusi 128m (14 runs, 1 line break)