Yeah that’s what it looks like to me too.I agree. You’ve got 3 players who all stepped up and did their job.
Take a look at the differences in their game:
There has to be some work being done by the coaching staff in the background to prepare these players. This isn’t all based on the individual’s skill – although I’m sure some of it is attributable to this. And that is a great advertisement for the recruitment team to be able to identify and retain those with the most promise.
- Host playing longer minutes than he has previously – seemingly without effort and without major game time in NRL
- Lawrie stepping up and doing his job with around 20 minutes game time to date
- Luc, based on his previous time in first grade, has obviously made some improvements to his game and showed signs of progression
Let’s look at this game – how many positions do we NEED to fill? 6? Even if we rotated 6 players through the team during the games to date (and we had a crystal ball so we knew this many players were needed), you end up probably giving most of the players around 40-60 minutes total first grade game time before you hit this point. Does that prepare them for this game? I would say hardly. Unless you are picking 2 and sticking with those players to the exclusion of all others, you aren’t going to be able to give them enough game time to adequately prepare them. And realistically, would you be replacing the current NRL players (who are performing) with youngsters just to get them game time? I know I would prefer to have my best players on the field as often and as long as possible.
What is the definition of preparation? 20 minutes total? 2 full games? Does preparation not include any sort of work outside of NRL game time? It’s great to say ‘prepare’ them. But what is your interpretation of preparation and how do you achieve it?
Unless we win this game, Mary will be on a hiding to nothing. Some people on here have been building this scenario up from the start of the season and, finally, at round 17, in the midst of origin and significant unforeseeable disruption, they may finally get to say “see, I told you so”.
Host played 54 mins, has been playing close to 80 most weeks in ISP - looked prepared to me.
Lawrie - played 34 minutes, ran 85 metres, 29 post contact metres, 1 tackle break, 27 tackles, 1 miss - looked prepared to me.
Luc - played 28 minutes, spent most of last year playing 80 in ISP I believe, ran 65 metres, 24 pcm, 12 tackles, 1 miss, came within centimetres of scoring a try and setting up another - looked prepared to me.
As you point out there are limited opportunities in first grade because the best players are in form so they play most minutes, and we’ve had amazing luck with injuries. Sure you could argue there could be be better use around the margins, but it would only amount to a small amount of minutes spread amongst half a dozen players.
And again, by the results, it’s working. We needed some young players, they were ready and stepped up and we won.
Picking how this weeks game is going to play out is impossible- both teams with major changes, playing in Melbourne against a team with Cameron Smith, I’ve got no idea what’s going to happen. But based on what I’ve seen, I’m not at all worried the young players will be unprepared.