billypilgrimnz
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,169
There was also a shocking call from the referee when the Dogs got a 20 metre 7 tackle set that should have been a changeover.
We got the rub of the green overall ref-wise, I thought.
There was also a shocking call from the referee when the Dogs got a 20 metre 7 tackle set that should have been a changeover.
Has anyone seen any improvement in our attacking structure?! It's absolute rubbish.
I don't understand how this isn't getting more attention from the media & most importantly the coach.
I didn't think the game was that bad. It was a tough, grinding style of game, which is the kind of game that the Bulldogs force oppositions to play. The Bulldogs might have the worst attack in the competition but they also have one of the best defences, so it was unrealistic to expect we'd blow them off the park.
There was plenty of effort there from the Dogs and other than not having much in attack I thought they played well. Possession was 50/50 and they made more meters than us and we made more tackles than them. They threw a lot of offloads - clearly they were playing for their season and chancing their arm in an effort to try to score more points but we kept shutting them down.
I thought we were patient in attack and didn't do anything stupid. I thought we also looked more organised in attack again with Clearly running the show.
Our discipline was good and we didn't give away penalties at crucial times in the game.
The only real negative for me was that DWZ had a bad night, in an otherwise good season for him.
There was also a shocking call from the referee when the Dogs got a 20 metre 7 tackle set that should have been a changeover.
Has anyone seen any improvement in our attacking structure?! It's absolute rubbish.
I don't understand how this isn't getting more attention from the media & most importantly the coach.
The DWZ try looked nice because we actually had shape and depth. The rest was not very good.
It reminded me of last week's game V Tits.We kept them in because of our rediculous ball security (dropped balls and screwing up the play the ball) and poor discipline.Anyone who ught DWZ should have been fullback before Edwards. Look at this game.
Anyone who thinks Moylan should still be fullback... look at this game.
Edwards is the best fullback at our club by miles. Moylan at 5/8th improves us too. He doesnt hold Cleary back. He wasnt there tonight and we missed him.
DWZ was terrible tonight. Looked dangerous but ultimately cost us more than he helped us... was it 4 ot 5 errors?
Our attack was good tonight. We win by 6 - 12 more if Blake learns to pass, they created the overlap well tonight. He seems determined to score himself.
In some areas yes.We got the rub of the green overall ref-wise, I thought.
Our attack was good tonight.
Bit optimistic. We scored two of the luckiest tries you'll ever see. They contributed 10 of our 16 points.
Sure I agree Blake bombed one but considering the other two were just pure luck? Still overall poor imo.
2 from 2 under Cummins this year. He must have the guilts the way he awarded the Raiders the semi-final last year.We got the rub of the green overall ref-wise, I thought.
Yeah, nah.
Unsure why Edwards is getting his dick sucked a lot by the usual super coaches on here.
I'm yet to see anything that says he should be in the team. 1 - DWZ 6 - Moylan
Maybe he's a world beater in NSW Cup, but so is Rein..
Considering the Dogs are one of the best defencive teams in the comp and they kept us out a few times with luck of their own I'm happy.
Yeah yeah. It was a grind against one of the better defencive teams but they did some good things that we all demanded earlier in the year. Now everyone wants to have a complain.
Look I'm happy with the win I'm just disappointed we aren't seeing improvement in the structure. When's it going to come?
Nice try Satan.We got the rub of the green overall ref-wise, I thought.