IOates, Copley, Hunt, Hala and Reed are some off the top of my head who have been brought through to first grade standard by Griffin. .
Copely, Hunt and Hala all debuted in 2009 under Henjak
Granville hasn't played there in years and was far from what you'd call a traditional fullback.
Wynnum fans could better explain it but it was one of those deals that would only work in the ISC. He was very hands on from memory.
This is true. Well spotted.
I didn't actually say they debuted under Griffin, though. I said they were brought through to first grade standard by Griffin.
Copley played 4 games in '09 and 2 in '10 so Henjak can hardly be credited for bringing him up to FG standard. Hunt played 2 in '09 and while he played 20 in '10, even he credits Griffin with moulding him into the player he is today.
Hala made 1 appearance in '09 and was obviously injured in '10 but Griffin has consistently picked him when he has been fit and his form warranted selection.
All of this illustrates my point that he does allow young talent to have a shot, just not as often as he probably should.
Jake played fullback for the last half of 2011 culminating in the Grand Final win. It was done basically because Wynnum had no other options at the time.
Even then, he went to dummy half coming out of his own half. He was fullback in defence and when Wynnum were in an attacking position.
Don't know about "one of those deals that would only work in the ISC" - NRL coaches just don't seem to try something different often enough to find out. The Walker brothers at Ipswich continually are creative with how the team plays and have had great success. It's always safety first in the NRL>
It's not Reserve Grade. The Intrust Supr Cup is "one of the top flight competitions", arguably the third best in the world. Plus better to watch than the NRL because it isn't as robotic.
To be honest, this whole 'blooding' debate is rubbish.We were discussing blooding new players.
No disrespect, but the point I was making is that it's a lesser standard to the NRL. More entertaining? Depends. Different strokes for different folks, really.
To be honest, this whole 'blooding' debate is rubbish.
Absolutely rubbish.
If debuting a bunch of players made you a great coach, then why were clubs like the Sharks in 2003 so dismal? They blooded 15 players that year and achieved next to nothing over the course of 12 seasons.
Furthermore, if Molo goes onto become anything over the next year or two, are we going to give Hook all the credit because he happened to give him 10 minutes against a woeful Wests outfit on a random Saturday night in May?
Of course not, at least I hope not.
I look at the next batch of 20s coming through and see plenty of exciting young talent who can make a difference.
But none of them were ready this year.
Of course Hook could have always handed these players a 10 minute cameo stint and what would it have really mattered at the end of the day?
The roster isn't the Broncos biggest problem in 2014. The problem is all the technical problems that have been apparent for sometime yet haven't been fixed and it's preventing the club from taking the next step.
That's why Hook won't be here next year.
That's hopefully why Kearney won't be with here either.
I am not just talking about "blooding new players" ... look at my post. I am talking about strategic player development - transitioning players from one level to the next. Having a multi-faceted plan.
The point is that Griffin has basically refused to give new players a shot when the opportunity has been there due to injury. That's when other clubs give young guys a shot, but instead riffin would rather play some hack out of position. Thank f**k he got sacked. We used to have a production line of talent and now we're missing the finals two years in a row. Not good enough for a flagship club.
Who would you boot from this week's side and who would you replace them with?
With all due respect, I wasn't responding to your post. What I was responding to was this perceived value of 'blooding' players which I believe is overrated for the reasons I described.
One thing to give these new kids a go, another to bring them through when they're actually ready.
Maybe that's been true in the past but the Broncos have actually had a fairly good run with injuries this year and there's rarely been that opportunity.
In fact, the one moment that I'm thinking of when there was a clear cut opportunity, the player in question got himself suspended...and now he's out injured for the rest of the year so he's well and truly stuffed.
No doubt there has been issues with the Broncos junior development for one reason or another. I believe in this current batch coming through and believe we'll see quite a few of them in first grade. However, none of them were ready to be anything more than bit players as far as this season goes.
Now I wouldn't be surprised to find out that's due to the way Hook has been developing them and the fundamentals he's taught them.
I also wouldn't be surprised to learn that they're simply young men developing their skills and getting used to the demands of professional sport.
Either way, just because they haven't been handed a free hand-out spot doesn't mean they haven't been improving this year. They have been and I wouldn't be surprised to see a few of them debut next year.
But I will stress that their non-selection hasn't been the issue holding this club back.
Which players that are unblooded are demanding selection with their form? It makes no sense for a professional outfit to just give away first grade spots in a hit-and-hope approach. That's even worse than being conservative with debuting rookies.
You have to name the players you believe Griffin is holding back.