Everyone is so negative. Yes we lost a crucial game, but zoom out, did you even think we’d be in this position in the first place? We played a top 4 team and lost. Wow what a shock after battling for the spoon last year
The fanfare surrounding S F and the constant talking him up with what he has done with this team means that with 3 rounds to go we shouldn’t be copping a flogging after a tough win.
The +/- clearly shows we are a poor team in attack & defence however some think including the dumb arse media that after jagging a few wins we are some how gigantic improvers but when we cop a belting they hop off our horse very quickly.
We in here try to find ways to talk it all up like
Sloan has improved ffs he caught some bombs in a couple of games back to back and he made a few critical tackles but IMO improvement means you don’t regress to your old ways but Sloan does exactly that.
Leilua still a poor defensive player and unfit
Lawrie well nothing more to say.
Hunt same old Ben.
F M well and truly over rated.
T E little wonder why he is with us and not the Storm
C T talked up because of tough carries but takes intercepts and is caught within 10 paces
Feagai’s were rightly on the outer in this place but a couple of goodish games and all of a sudden S F has turned them around and they are keepers fmd they are barely back up.
Of course there are others but we know the truth about them.
Other than the ladder position I would really like to know where the improvement is and how much of it has been sustained and that IMO sits directly with the coach.
If improvements are not sustained then why call them improvements aren’t they just an occasional blip on the radar?
