Rumour Signings

[Parrasque]

Dykes----------> Souths

 

[Rammo]

Dykes to the Bulldogs, Bulldgos do need a 5/8.

Don't know that we have enough money to spend, I have heard ruomors of Lee Hookey linking with the Dogs though.

 

[aussies1st]

That was quick, Sharks already trying to offload Dykes.

 

[Stagger eel]

Dykes to the Bulldogs, Bulldgos do need a 5/8.

you make a very good point, Souths have also denied that they have approached Dykes.

 

[Berkeley_Eagle]

Dykes to the Bulldogs, Bulldgos do need a 5/8.

so do Manly

 

[Big Mick]

Manly don't have money to spend right now as it is...they could only barely afford George Rose.. They have spent their cap there is no way they'll get Dykes.

 

[Hurriflatch]

if they get rid of Monghan and maybe Witt they'll have enough

 

[Big Mick]

they'll have to pay Monoghan's contract out and pay part of it if he changes clubs. he had a three year agreement. I don't think Souths will just let it be a straight out release when they could get half of it paid for

 

[Hurriflatch]

true but

Monaghan will be on $240,000 next year

so, $120,000
+ so $80,000 if they release Witt
So thats 200k that Manly have free under the cap

then the Sharks would need to pay so of Dykes' deal

 

[sharks4ever]

owen craigie to souths on a contract that will see him getting weighed before thew game

 

[aussies1st]

Haven't South learned. Craigie isn't FG material.

 

[Spike]

Sutton is already at least twice the player then that fat f*ck Craigie ever was. It would be a step back for the Bunnies.

 

[Big Mick]

true but

Monaghan will be on $240,000 next year

so, $120,000
+ so $80,000 if they release Witt
So thats 200k that Manly have free under the cap

then the Sharks would need to pay so of Dykes' deal

Agreed....but Stuart Raper said tonight that Adam's Dykes's decisions is purely a financial one....should be interesting.

 

[sharks4ever]

Sutton is already at least twice the player then that fat f*ck Craigie ever was. It would be a step back for the Bunnies.

i think he will be playing lock somehow

 

[colonel_123]

true but

Monaghan will be on $240,000 next year

so, $120,000
+ so $80,000 if they release Witt
So thats 200k that Manly have free under the cap

then the Sharks would need to pay so of Dykes' deal

While Manly would have to pay some or all of Monaghan and Witt's contracts, were they released, that money does not count towards Manly's cap as neither of those players would be playing for Manly.

 

[Tom Arber]

While Manly would have to pay some or all of Monaghan and Witt's contracts, were they released, that money does not count towards Manly's cap as neither of those players would be playing for Manly.

Wrong, wrong... and wrong.

 

[Big Mick]

While Manly would have to pay some or all of Monaghan and Witt's contracts, were they released, that money does not count towards Manly's cap as neither of those players would be playing for Manly.

It actually does count towards the cap.

 

[Esoj]

this one is proabbly more hopefull by hull fans but you never know with the warriors

Faumuina warriors----> Hull (beyond just this six weeks)

 

[Mighty Tiger]

While Manly would have to pay some or all of Monaghan and Witt's contracts, were they released, that money does not count towards Manly's cap as neither of those players would be playing for Manly.

You really have no clue as to how the cap works do you?

 

[Stagger eel]

While Manly would have to pay some or all of Monaghan and Witt's contracts, were they released, that money does not count towards Manly's cap as neither of those players would be playing for Manly.

yes it does.