Rumoured and Confirmed signings - Part 4

[Luke Bowden]

However, you clearly did. Lol.

No, that’s your paranoia playing up again.

 

[Jane Murray]

No, that’s your paranoia playing up again.

How predictable that you will respond? Show me your medical degree considering that you have made another assumption? Lol.

 

[Luke Bowden]

Yeah fair point, you might not actually come out and say it’s the reason. Depends on the industry I suspect. For instance if you were working with children, you’d probably be told if a past conviction was the problem.

exactly. That’s why I think it’s a bit much to say that you can’t play in the NRL if you’ve been found guilty of any offence.

 

[Luke Bowden]

How predictable that you will respond? So me your medical degree considering that you have made another assumption? Lol.

You respond to every post I make, even the ones that aren’t aimed at you.

Why do I need a medical degree?

 

[herbert henry1908]

exactly. That’s why I think it’s a bit much to say that you can’t play in the NRL if you’ve been found guilty of any offence.

Any offence is way too broad. But the NRL players are contractors, so stipulating certain offences probably wouldn’t be a problem.

 

[Jane Murray]

You respond to every post I make, even the ones that aren’t aimed at you.

Why do I need a medical degree?

OMFG, Luke, use your brain. Actually, wrong, it is you, in fact, who usually responds to my posts, which is not aimed at you. Nice try though.

You have just made the assumption that I am paranoid, with a diagnosis like that, only a psychiatrist, can make that.

 

[Luke Bowden]

OMFG, Luke, use your brain. Actually, wrong, it is you, in fact, who usually responds to my posts, which is not aimed at you. Nice try though.

You have just made the assumption that I am paranoid, with a diagnosis like that, only a psychiatrist, can make that.

No, that’s my “Opinion” which on here, according to you, I’m entitled to post.

That’s according to you.

enough now, let’s leave it at that (I know you won’t be able too) and talk about footy.

 

[Luke Bowden]

Any offence is way too broad. But the NRL players are contractors, so stipulating certain offences probably wouldn’t be a problem.

Absolutely.

 

[ACTPanthers]

And you guys wondered why I ignore certain posters... This is just really f**king stupid and drastically bringing down the level of conversation that normally occurs here.

The absolute carry on from this Jane dickhead is pathetic and just screams attention seeking.

 

[Luke Bowden]

And you guys wondered why I ignore certain posters... This is just really f**king stupid and drastically bringing down the level of conversation that normally occurs here.

The absolute carry on from this Jane dickhead is pathetic and just screams attention seeking.

Yeah my bad, I won’t be talking to her anymore, you’re 100% right.

 

[franklin2323]

Really, your excluding people from jobs because of their criminal history..... you may not want to advertise that.

It is not illegal to need a clean criminal history depending on the type of work you do

 

[franklin2323]

Every government job I've ever applied for I've needed to provide a criminal history check. Maybe Franklin is a public servant?

not entirely but sort of yes. We recruit but say the job is to go into people's homes then they won't hire if there are certain things on the history

 

[Jane Murray]

And you guys wondered why I ignore certain posters... This is just really f**king stupid and drastically bringing down the level of conversation that normally occurs here.

The absolute carry on from this Jane dickhead is pathetic and just screams attention seeking.

Lol.

 

[franklin2323]

Yeah fair point, you might not actually come out and say it’s the reason. Depends on the industry I suspect. For instance if you were working with children, you’d probably be told if a past conviction was the problem.

To answer the above. If you are hiring a carer for an elderly parent that may live at home alone then you should be able to request a clean criminal history

 

[Jane Murray]

It is not illegal to need a clean criminal history depending on the type of work you do

Exactly, franklin, nursing, for example, you need to undergo a criminal, and working with children, check. If the applicant is on the register, it is illegal for them not to reveal that.

 

[Jane Murray]

No, that’s my “Opinion” which on here, according to you, I’m entitled to post.

That’s according to you.

enough now, let’s leave it at that (I know you won’t be able too) and talk about footy.

I am willing to, if you are willing to meet me half way? As for ACTPanther, that is a different kettle of fish all together.

 

[Luke Bowden]

It is not illegal to need a clean criminal history depending on the type of work you do

Like playing rugby league?

 

[ACTPanthers]

For jobs that require a security clearance, or WWVP, I can't see a problem with requiring a clean record.

As Luke states though, not the same for footy players.

I think serious crimes should carry a ban from footy, life for some instances, but misdemeanours that end up on your permanent record shouldn't be that much of a problem.

 

[franklin2323]

For jobs that require a security clearance, or WWVP, I can't see a problem with requiring a clean record.

As Luke states though, not the same for footy players.

I think serious crimes should carry a ban from footy, life for some instances, but misdemeanours that end up on your permanent record shouldn't be that much of a problem.

The issue is though. Everyone has a different view on what serious is... So how do you decide what is or isn't bad enough?

 

[franklin2323]

Like playing rugby league?

Well you need a clear history to be a Shopping Centre santa... yet convicted sex offenders like May and Blake Ferguson are fine to pose for photos with kids and attend junior clinics.