U couldn't be more wrong oh "great one" Sandow is our X factor, give him a decent pack and not the bitches of the past he will perform week in week out end of story.........Sandow is priority not Foran, we went alright without him last night, yes?
As I said, Sandow is as good as any playmaker in the game when his pack dominates. The thing is there are very few forward packs as weak as Manly's and things won't be as easy for Sandow as they were last night.
If we had Foran instead of Sandow last night I'm sure we wouldn't have scored as many tries, but we probably would have conceded none. And against stronger packs I would take Foran any day. Can you imagine Sandow playing behind Manly's pack last night? He would have been the worst player on the field.
If we replace Sandow with Foran we will improve massively in defence, plus we'll attack better in the close games (ruck parity). The only area we would suffer would be our long kicking, where Sandow is the best in the game while Foran and Norman are both average.
But having an average kicking game is still better than having Chris Sandow in your defensive line. And I say this as someone who loves Sandow. He is one of my favourite players. I will be stoked if we keep him because I trust Arthur's judgement over my own.