"We can keep everyone that we want to keep but we won't be overpaying for anyone," Seward said. "If it's out of our market or out of our price range, then so be it. If it's to be where we believe market value is, we'd love to keep them. We're not going to get into bidding wars for players. If they are a player we want and we think they're required, we'll pay what we think we need to pay. If that means we lose some, then that's something we have to accept. We're not going to stuff our salary cap position up because of that.
"Chris has come through Parramatta's darkest days of playing behind a beaten pack and playing for multiple coaches. He's now in a stage where he has the opportunity to play behind an outstanding forward pack with a coach who is going to be here long term and you're seeing the results he's producing. He's well and truly required from our perspective."
"My personal view was that there wasn't a view to the future," Seward said of the previous management. "If you go back a few years when we bought some players towards the end of their careers and paid a lot for them. I would have preferred we had taken a punt on three or four local juniors. I don't think anyone went out of their way to destroy the salary cap, so to speak, but the outcome has been that it was an absolute mess. We're going to pay for it in a period of time and we have paid for it in losing some players.
"There was clearly no philosophy on how the cap was going to work outside of a year-to-year scenario and clearly there were a lot of short-term decisions made that weren't successful. You add to your team by bringing in veterans like Choc Watmough. You don't build a team by bringing veterans in to fill a hole."