Unless we are shopping Klem around, Finucane just doesn't make sense to me. It's spending too much on the pack. With Pearce taking a pay cut next year, we'd be lucky to be spending a full million on our halves? $300k was the number floated for Clifford and I think Pearce went down to something around $600k. This is all well and good for a year or two, but what happens when these contracts all expire and clubs are throwing double that or more at Clifford? Chad Townsend is earning $800k a year next year onwards ffs. Dumb, desperate clubs are always willing to spend overs for a half. Meanwhile I'd be surprised if DSaf is getting less than 650-700k for his next contract, and his brother might not be too far behind that the way he's going... Friz is 700k, Klem 800k... and we want to throw huge money at Finucane too?
It just doesn't make sense on the face of it. Something has to give. Waiting eagerly to see what happens with Watson at this point. I don't think he's out the door yet, but it won't surprise me if another club throws a dumb offer at him that he can't refuse either. I love having Watson in the team, and I'm sure he'd stay here for less - but how much less? What if a Tigers or St George throw 800k at him? Saving my outrage at this point until we know the ins and outs of whatever ends up happening... but if we lose him because we insist on spending 700k+ on every single one of our forwards, I'd say that'll leave a bad taste in my mouth. Finucane doesn't offer much more than what we already have. He's a quality player, but at some point you have to stop spending on the pack and fill other desperate needs - as well as keeping the guns that we do have already.