Mr_Knightside
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,377
I'd be fine with Grevsmuhl if it is on a 1 year deal on minimum coin with the option of an extra year or two in the club's favour. Not much risk involved in trying him out like that. Not sure what "personal issues" means in this context, I know he was released from Penrith quite suddenly and there didn't seem to be much public word about it so not sure what it's about. Either way if the club does it's due diligence and decides that he's worth the risk then I don't have a problem.
Fensom is an interesting one, he'd walk into our best 17 imo but I would be reluctant to pay him the money that he's rumoured to be on, wasn't it $500k or something? I think he's more like a $300k forward at this stage especially given he's not currently first choice at raiders. Maybe we can get them to pay a bit of his contract and we can get him for a discount. We could slot him straight in at #13 and that would really shore up our defence around the middle.
Fensom is an interesting one, he'd walk into our best 17 imo but I would be reluctant to pay him the money that he's rumoured to be on, wasn't it $500k or something? I think he's more like a $300k forward at this stage especially given he's not currently first choice at raiders. Maybe we can get them to pay a bit of his contract and we can get him for a discount. We could slot him straight in at #13 and that would really shore up our defence around the middle.