Rather stick with Sharpe for a year and develop him than get someone like Reynolds who is only likely ok for 1 year if he can stay on the field, age is catching up.
Is it? Honestly he's playing better than ever from what I've seen. The stuff he's always been good at, he's only gotten better at. He's never had the athletic ability to impose himself on a game like the absolute top tier 7's anyway so the athletic decline isn't as big an issue for him. But I reckon there's no player in the comp the game moves slower for right now.
He's always been a bit of a weird player in that he's kind of looked busted since before he hit 30... yet 2024 was the first season where he'd played fewer than 20 games since 2016. And he's 34 and reckons he's got two seasons left, which would mean he retires at about the same age DCE is now.
Have NFI how realistic or economic it is (honestly think a lot depends on what we signed Sharpe for), but apparently the Broncos only have $300K in the cap for him (and have young prospects like Mozer and Black they'll be eager to lock down). And there's a case to be made that Sharpe would learn more training with Reyno & playing reserve grade than he would in first grade without the kind of guidance and insight a player like Adam can offer. Similarly, Brown, if he's going to learn to be a halfback, could stand to learn a lot from him (Moses is a better player than Reyno but I've never heard great wraps about him as a mentor; have mostly just heard that Mitch is a bit of a prick).
A lot of "it depends" in there but I certainly wouldn't be mad if we came up with $450Kish for him + a wink-wink nudge-nudge post-retirement job offer to be our new halves coach. One of the things Newy has going for it is that it's a good spot to raise kids (that's why a lot of our signings have been old blokes with families). I think there are potential long term benefits which can be factored in here.