The things is the dogs where apparently in bit of cap trouble this year- Then it all went quiet. They will unload players. But it could cost them young Frawley in future. Who will be off contract in a year.
What cap???Who says that the Dogs are over the cap for 2018? We don't even know what the cap is.
He extended in December brother, so a club approaching the Dogs about a release may have a good chance.
Also congrats on the personal news, my friend!
Foran 3 clubs in 3 years
He's a bigger whore than $BW
We need the best of what we can get. Evans is a line bender, so is Vave, so is Matagi. What we need is metre makers.
Tolman plays like 60 mins a game. Start with him and Mannah, Brown at lock (who has exceeded 150m three times this season). That gives you bulk metres and a massive potential for impact off the bench. Brown and Tolman at 60 odd mins a game and an almost guaranteed 100-150m, Mannah at 40-50 mins a game and 100m+ more often than not, you can bring on a Matagi and a Vave and an Evans to go absolutely nuts for 30 mins and play that Junior Paulo role....
They may be yet to prove it but I think you will find Vave and Matagi were bought to be those line benders you seek.We don't need toilers we need people who can bend the line e.g Jubior Paulo types. We have too many light weights as it is
It'll be 4 in 4Foran 3 clubs in 3 years
He's a bigger whore than $BW
And it will be 4 in 4 yearsForan 3 clubs in 3 years
He's a bigger whore than $BW
Here's how Paulo plays long minutes. He is at the bottom of this list:
Tackles per minute 2016 (average minutes)
0.70 Fensom (51)
0.70 Friend (76)
0.70 Hannant (35)
0.69 Alvaro (38)
0.66 James (59)
0.64 Evans (34)
0.64 Myles (43)
0.64 K. Pritchard (27)
0.63 Graham (61)
0.62 Boyd (35)
0.62 Peats (65)
0.61 G. Burgess (39)
0.61 Mannah (40)
0.61 McInnes (63)
0.61 Rein (70)
0.61 Tolman (60)
0.60 McCullough (67)
0.60 McLean (38)
0.60 Terepo (38)
0.59 Brown (46)
0.58 Lichaa (75)
0.57 De Gois (55)
0.57 Finucane (60)
0.57 McGuire (58)
0.57 Napa (57)
0.57 Prior (44)
0.56 Tamou (47)
0.55 T. Burgess (45)
0.55 Cook (49)
0.55 Matagi (29)
0.55 Matulino (52)
0.55 Waerea-Hargreaves (49)
0.54 Moa (37)
0.54 A. Fifita (55)
0.54 C. Smith (80)
0.54 Vaughan (38)
0.53 O'Brien (26)
0.53 J. Trbojevich (70)
0.52 Farah (65)
0.52 Heighington (33)
0.51 Bromwich (59)
0.51 Granville (62)
0.50 Parker (61)
0.49 Lussick (43)
0.48 S. Burgess (72)
0.48 Pulu (37)
0.48 Woods (57)
0.47 Gallen (64)
0.47 Hodgson (71)
0.47 Klemmer (54)
0.47 M. Scott (46)
0.46 Taumalolo (52)
0.46 Vave (35)
0.45 Ennis (80)
0.44 Paasi (45)
0.43 Luke (72)
0.42 Kasiano (31)
0.39 Paulo (49)
I looked at 2016 stats because the sample is larger, and only looked at middle defenders (and only some of them). Obviously those who spent any minutes anywhere else (e.g. Peats spending some time at edge forward to cover for injury) will have their stats distorted.
For comparison I have also included Eels middle forward stats for 2017:
0.67 Alvaro (30)
0.64 Mannah (37)
0.64 Vave (30)
0.62 Terepo (37)
0.58 K. Pritchard (71)
0.58 B. Scott (44)
0.50 Brown (60)
0.46 Matagi (44)
0.39 O'Brien (17)
It'll be 4 in 4
Manly 2015
Parra 2016
Warriors 2017
Dogs 2018
That's Arana Taumata/Adam Peek kind of club hopping!
Or that the really good teams share the load better???So the two best teams in the competition at controlling the play the ball and who were also the two best teams in the comp last season and also played in the Grand Final last year have only 1 player in the top 20 and 6 in the top 40 between them.
What this tell us is that this is just a stat for the sake of having a stat and has no bearing on a teams ability to win football games
Doesn't it tell us that the less players you have higher up in this list, the more possession you must have during the course of the game because your players are not needed to defend as much. If you have more possession (and retain it) then it is obvious that you would likely be better at controlling the play the ball.So the two best teams in the competition at controlling the play the ball and who were also the two best teams in the comp last season and also played in the Grand Final last year have only 1 player in the top 20 and 6 in the top 40 between them.
What this tell us is that this is just a stat for the sake of having a stat and has no bearing on a teams ability to win football games
Nailed it.Doesn't it tell us that the less players you have higher up in this list, the more possession you must have during the course of the game because your players are not needed to defend as much. If you have more possession (and retain it) then it is obvious that you would likely be better at controlling the play the ball.
They will lock him in the leagues club attic and feed him a bucket of fish heads once a week.What happens to poor old Michael Gordon now if Teddy is going to the Rooters?
Doesn't it tell us that the less players you have higher up in this list, the more possession you must have during the course of the game because your players are not needed to defend as much. If you have more possession (and retain it) then it is obvious that you would likely be better at controlling the play the ball.
"I don't know what your argument is, but it's wrong!!!"I would have thought all it does tell you that we had, across a season, less possession than our opponents. So the way Pou Bear has portrayed the stats, showing that our players are high up on tackles per minutes, is not a statistic to demonstrate that your team will be successful and it was useless for Pou Bear's argument...whatever the purpose of that was.