- Messages
- 20,191
I heard on the radio the other day that the NRL won't let him play in Japan in the off-season. Why not? They didn't stop SBW. Do they even have the power to do that?
SBW didn't have a registered NRL contract semi does
I heard on the radio the other day that the NRL won't let him play in Japan in the off-season. Why not? They didn't stop SBW. Do they even have the power to do that?
SBW didn't have a registered NRL contract semi does
Yep, we are screwed either way, best case senario he comes back and we get one more year out of him before he pisses off to Overseas Yawnion.We could release him, but his contract to come back isn't binding until the NRL signs off on it. That leaves him free to f**k off and leave us holding our dick.
We could release him, but his contract to come back isn't binding until the NRL signs off on it. That leaves him free to f**k off and leave us holding our dick.
Yep, we are screwed either way, best case senario he comes back and we get one more year out of him before he pisses off to Overseas Yawnion.
So the eels and semi agree to part ways at the end of the season, as long as he signs a contract that he will come back. So then he's free to leave, play in Japan, and when he comes back we send his new contract to the NRL ?
They won't wear that (in terms of an 'upfront' strategy). That's effectively a loan move in the off-season, and if allowed would open a pretty obvious method of getting round the cap.
If a player was actually released, and subsequently decided to come back it would probably be ok.....but setting the whole thing up in advance is unlikely to 'wash'.
Even if he stayed after this contract we would have to pay market price. It's likely we would get better value out of any other winger.
How is it a method of getting around the cap? Because we would pay less as we have him for a shorter time?(even though he wouldn't miss a game) Is this what you mean because I don't see it as a rort at all. And why would the NRL have a problem with this now?
How are you going to police additional payments received by the player when he is not on an NRL contract? How are you going to determine who the player plays for while away from the NRL, and who it really is that is paying them? Particularly if a bloke goes to a British club and is then paid through trusts set up in the British Virgin Islands. What if he goes to play in the Russel Crowe Invitational Sevens comp, and gets paid $500k for a months worth of playing for the Orara Valley Axemen?
Can't you pay them illegally anyway, even while they have an NRL contract? Considering the NRL don't have access to tax records.
Other than that, please shut up, Barry.
How could we better value out of any other winger considering Semi is the best we've had since Eric Grothe Snr (Hayne withstanding)?
Paying a lesser winger a lower salary doesn't equate better value.
Semi is a rare commodity, and I don't go for this crap that wingers should be paid less.
He does stuff that others can't or could never do.
That means he's worth more.
I'm not saying the we should pay him what he or his manager wants, but he is worth more to the Eels than just his salary and a normal wingers salary at that.
He'll pay us back in merchandise and season tickets and publicity easily.
Radradra is also a marketing tool.
Of course you can always lie.
I think value is heavily related to how good a player is ... parra could get great value out of me playing for a pie n coke after each game .... of course i would probably let in 5 tries a game ... so maybe not great value after all
Well if they're only feeding you pies and coke then how do they expect you to compete?