Rumours and Stuff

[Forty20]

What does blue shirt, green shirt, orange shirt, red shirt, purple shirt mean?

Orange is non-contact. Red is spine. Green usually means opposed squad. Purple might be opposed spine.

 

[Gronk]

I f**ken told you before merkin.

And I told you that it nothing to do with the wiggles. FFS.

 

[hindy111]

Orange is non-contact. Red is spine. Green usually means opposed squad. Purple might be opposed spine.

Did Hayne remember that playbook?

 

[parrathruandthru]

Orange is non-contact. Red is spine. Green usually means opposed squad. Purple might be opposed spine.

correct (90% of the time). Sometimes BA changes things like Clint Eastwood in Heartbreak Ridge. eg check pics from last weeks captains run

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Not only do the opposing teams (for opposed sessions) have different coloured bibs for their fullback and halves, but sometimes the squad is divided into groups for drills and small team games. In this instance the bibs just represent those groups.

 

[Bandwagon]

What does blue shirt, green shirt, orange shirt, red shirt, purple shirt mean ?

Trialling for the Wiggles?

 

[Bandwagon]

And I told you that it nothing to do with the wiggles. FFS.

yeah, saw this too late

 

[Poupou Escobar]

It's a goodun though.

 

[phantom eel]

I'm not going to get involved in the argument either way,

Then why do you keep posting Baz...? It's hilarious how often you avoid things you say you want to avoid by - doing exactly that...!

 

[phantom eel]

"
Elkin was one of the scapegoats of the Sharks’ drugs scandal a few years back, losing his job.

He has since been cleared of any wrong doing but despite impressive credentials, can’t get a break and was passed over by the Eels. "

http://www.nospam47.com/au/league/l...radman-best/8m8zqzf40myl1du1zgqvjzcc0/slide/3

?? The person Avenger was talking about ?

Yes.

You were saying we should take back peptide Elkin...?

 

[Glenneel]

Problem is he's also worth every cent for about ten other clubs

But by reports 10 other clubs don't have the money. Remember apparently 11 clubs over the cap, that only leaves 5 under and some of those probably have less than $600k in their cap. Not sure of Parra's situation but if we played this year apparently well under the cap (until Moses) than I'm sure we still have plenty of leeway as cap is $2m higher.
Look at Dogs, apparently $2m over cap, so they need to get rid of their high profile players on plenty of coin. Of their roster only Klemmer and Jackson are the standouts, all the rest they would probably have to give away for almost nothing, so that will not fix their cap. And those 2 players will not relieve their cap of $2m, probably $1m could be saved with Dogs throwing in a small amount of subsidy.

 

[parra-matters]

The dogs stiffed their cap for next year by taking a punt on what the cap might be so now they expect the NRL to raise the cap or let them be over next year and take 2-300k off their cap then next 2-3 seasons.
Are they serious?

 

[Gronk]

The dogs stiffed their cap for next year by taking a punt on what the cap might be so now they expect the NRL to raise the cap or let them be over next year and take 2-300k off their cap then next 2-3 seasons.
Are they serious?

Ray Dibb had lunch with 4 CEOs yesterday and THEY decided that the cap should be $9.6m. They plan to tell Todd of their decision today.

 

[ash411]

Ray Dibb had lunch with 4 CEOs yesterday and THEY decided that the cap should be $9.6m. They plan to tell Todd of their decision today.

yeah... if they can get him on the phone...

Why only 9.6? why didn't they just make it an even 10M?

 

[parra-matters]

Ray Dibb had lunch with 4 CEOs yesterday and THEY decided that the cap should be $9.6m. They plan to tell Todd of their decision today.

yeah well they will need 12 out of the 16 teams to agree.
I can't see the tigers, Dragons, Titans or Knights voting for it, I doubt that we would even vote for it.
They might get 6-8 vote for it but can't see them getting 12.

 

[Kornstar]

Maybe Mr Dibb can pay the difference to all the clubs?

 

[IFR33K]

yeah well they will need 12 out of the 16 teams to agree.
I can't see the tigers, Dragons, Titans or Knights voting for it, I doubt that we would even vote for it.
They might get 6-8 vote for it but can't see them getting 12.

Nrl is in the red! That's why the cap isn't going up much. They can't afford the grants to clubs.

 

[ash411]

yeah well they will need 12 out of the 16 teams to agree.
I can't see the tigers, Dragons, Titans or Knights voting for it, I doubt that we would even vote for it.
They might get 6-8 vote for it but can't see them getting 12.

Didn't watch the video, did you?

The Dragons CEO was at the lunch...

 

[Chipmunk]

Didn't watch the video, did you?

The Dragons CEO was at the lunch...

yeah well they will need 12 out of the 16 teams to agree.
I can't see the tigers, Dragons, Titans or Knights voting for it, I doubt that we would even vote for it.
They might get 6-8 vote for it but can't see them getting 12.

Interestingly enough apparently the Broncos and the Storm don't want the salary cap to increase.

 

[Twizzle]

I can understand the Bronocs not wanting to give the other clubs the capacity to spend like they do, they want to keep their unfair advantage of the ridiculous amount of TPAs that they have access to.