84 Baby
Referee
- Messages
- 29,653
The cupboard on that site is where it's at. Anyone is welcome.
Dargan was discussed weeks before that blog.
Also credit to Snake, as he was one of the first to mention it along with some others.
The cupboard on that site is where it's at. Anyone is welcome.
Dargan was discussed weeks before that blog.
Also credit to Snake, as he was one of the first to mention it along with some others.
Chief with the fake Scoop????Well Proz did have a rumour the other day which you claimed as your own pretending you had inside info on Filthy_Spammers!!
LOL!!!The cupboard on that site is where it's at. Anyone is welcome.
Dargan was discussed weeks before that blog.
Also credit to Snake, as he was one of the first to mention it along with some others.
LOL!!!
The only thIng discussed in the Cupboard are prolapsed anus’s and much you and Vince miss Ron.
Ok so say we sign him and Gutho is fit for Rnd1.
Moses plays reggies or did we release Norman or Gutho or Moses ?
And you voted for that bonehead Sharp,and Proshenks was Fitzy’s Lap Dog anyway wasn’t he???Lol - but
The whole point of this excersise was to recognize that the leaks have stopped, coinciding with the lack of substantiated rumors.
Some people are obviously very disappointed and there's absolutely no doubt they were voting for the spagnolo factions at Rosehill.
You know who you are.
Don’t think Norman would be keen on being shunted to 1 given he was finally getting a mention for origin in the halves this year and played in the PMs game. He goes to 1 and any chance of him ever playing rep footy dies
I don't really care about the questions though. My point is that stats do absolutely show the quality of a player.
However a pertinent question is this: Is Bellamy responsible for developing Slater, Cronk and Smith, or were they always going to turn out that good? It's possible they were just comparatively great at recruiting when they found those three. They probably had a bit of luck too.
That Dargan to the Broncos rumor was here long before Prozhenks even thought of tweeting it.
You see now he sifts through sites like these for material, whilst in previous years he was an Eels factions c*€k smoker.
hell yeah - free world and all thatIgnore that guy, Chiefy. You talk up that place as much as you like.
I don't know .... can you tell me whoLol - but
The whole point of this excersise was to recognize that the leaks have stopped, coinciding with the lack of substantiated rumors.
Some people are obviously very disappointed and there's absolutely no doubt they were voting for the spagnolo factions at Rosehill.
You know who you are.
For every hit in Baseball, wether infield or outfield there is an entire playbook for each and every situation from cut offs, backing plays and pre empting the runners on base based in their speed. You need to field in different formations based on the hitters count, number of out and what pitch is being thrown.
That little thing in Cricket where the ball is heading towards the fence and their is a trail runner running behind the fielder and the lead fielder flicks it up to him, yep came from Baseball after Mike Young, ex Aussie fielding coach brought his baseball skills to the team. Now everyone is doing it.
I like Cricket, have played the game as well and one is more a game of attrition to survive and the other is chess, moving the peices around the board and out smarting your opponent. You only need to look at the stats in Baseball to realise how much goes on in the game and the strategy is too hard for people to understand.
Lol - but
The whole point of this excersise was to recognize that the leaks have stopped, coinciding with the lack of substantiated rumors.
Some people are obviously very disappointed and there's absolutely no doubt they were voting for the spagnolo factions at Rosehill.
You know who you are.
For every hit in Baseball, wether infield or outfield there is an entire playbook for each and every situation from cut offs, backing plays and pre empting the runners on base based in their speed. You need to field in different formations based on the hitters count, number of out and what pitch is being thrown.
That little thing in Cricket where the ball is heading towards the fence and their is a trail runner running behind the fielder and the lead fielder flicks it up to him, yep came from Baseball after Mike Young, ex Aussie fielding coach brought his baseball skills to the team. Now everyone is doing it.
I like Cricket, have played the game as well and one is more a game of attrition to survive and the other is chess, moving the peices around the board and out smarting your opponent. You only need to look at the stats in Baseball to realise how much goes on in the game and the strategy is too hard for people to understand.
Tbh, I love cricket, and I like baseball - but I'd compare them both to chess.
For different reasons, but both sports employ a great deal of tactical nous.
The biggest loser is s actually you...
you’re the 1 that’s cut up about the lack you of info...
all those PMs you can be harrassing people for info and nothing to show for... people have worked you and your junkie mate from the cross out
Yeh, but chess is more of team game. Though it's quite anti-democratic.
I'm sure everyone including myself are ecstatic about the lack of information coming from the club.
The only people who aren't are the factionlist fekkwitts, who'd rather destroy this great club for their own self gain, rather than have the club succeed.
The leaks have stopped.