What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,337
Austin would be a very good signing as a #14. He's (his) light years ahead of Will Smith and the like. But, you wouldn't want him as a first choice starting half.

he had a very good season about 2 or 3 years ago playing in the halves but really hasn't be able to reproduce that form

maybe BA thinks he can do it again
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,379
he had a very good season about 2 or 3 years ago playing in the halves but really hasn't be able to reproduce that form

maybe BA thinks he can do it again
It would certainly be a risk. Which isn't the same as a bad signing, nor would it mean it was a mistake if it didn't work out. Nobody knows how risk will pan out until after the fact. The question is whether you can afford to take the risk vs whether you can afford not to.
 

Gazzamatta

Coach
Messages
15,646
It would certainly be a risk. Which isn't the same as a bad signing, nor would it mean it was a mistake if it didn't work out. Nobody knows how risk will pan out until after the fact. The question is whether you can afford to take the risk vs whether you can afford not to.
As a club we are totally incapable of improving any footballers defence. In fact it tends to get worse under our structures. I love Austins attacking skills and we could desperately use them but until our club learns to defend at an NRL level, such players would be wasted regretably.
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,171
OK. But that was in the year we got busted for the cap cheating. We didn't have a lot of choice (other than to give up).

The biggest issue is we still have inferior replacements 2 years later.

We also released Hayne too and then got in Reece Robinson. Regardless of the reasons I think what it shows is that you shouldn't be releasing quality players in your spine mid contract unless you have a quality replacement as they are hard to come by. If we release Norman for Austin, which is looking a possibility, it is a dumb f**k move.
 

lingard

Coach
Messages
11,423
We also released Hayne too and then got in Reece Robinson. Regardless of the reasons I think what it shows is that you shouldn't be releasing quality players in your spine mid contract unless you have a quality replacement as they are hard to come by. If we release Norman for Austin, which is looking a possibility, it is a dumb f**k move.

Disagree. With a player like Norman, you release him when you get the opportunity - and replace him with someone of equal quality as soon as that opportunity arises. Rarely would those two opportunities arrive at exactly the same time.
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,171
Disagree. With a player like Norman, you release him when you get the opportunity - and replace him with someone of equal quality as soon as that opportunity arises. Rarely would those two opportunities arrive at exactly the same time.

Well we are still waiting for a decent replacement for Peats over 2 years later. How long are you prepared to wait for an equivalent replacement for Norman?
 
Messages
19,393
The biggest issue is we still have inferior replacements 2 years later.

We also released Hayne too and then got in Reece Robinson. Regardless of the reasons I think what it shows is that you shouldn't be releasing quality players in your spine mid contract unless you have a quality replacement as they are hard to come by. If we release Norman for Austin, which is looking a possibility, it is a dumb f**k move.

Look I agree in terms of the overall quality of who we've signed. But, the Norman for Austin thing is simply an assumption. Neither of these events have happened, and if we do let Norman go and sign Austin that still doesn't mean that they want Austin to be a #1 or #2 half.

What do you do when Wonderboy says 'I'm shooting through'? You can't make him play for you....all you can do is stop him playing in the NRL until a release is negotiated.
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,171
Look I agree in terms of the overall quality of who we've signed. But, the Norman for Austin thing is simply an assumption. Neither of these events have happened, and if we do let Norman go and sign Austin that still doesn't mean that they want Austin to be a #1 or #2 half.

Austin won't be coming to be a super sub. We need Warrington to offer him a deal he can't refuse.
 
Messages
19,393
Austin won't be coming to be a super sub. We need Warrington to offer him a deal he can't refuse.

Depends what his choices are. If the Raiders are pushing him out the door, and no other NRL club says 'come and play #6 for us', why wouldn't he sign? Particularly as you're going to play a fair bit of firsts as the 3 choice half anyway.
 

IFR33K

Coach
Messages
17,043
In the sense that I recognise they are acting under significant constraints then I suppose I am a yes man. If we continually get shit people running the club then it is either just bad luck, or a structural problem, or it is somebody's fault. Whose fault could it be if we keep getting low quality coaches and administrators year after year after year? Come on merkin, give me some names. I want a scapegoat too.


I’ve never said BA is a low quality coach. I have said he’s made some very very questionable signings. What I’ve also said is all coaches do have expiry dates, maybe BA has outlasted his. As for low quality coaches, who would honestly give RS a start tomorrow if he’s terminated? And would like to see how SK would go without BS.
 
Top