Winning the ruck wasn't such a big deal in 2016 or 2017 compared to this year. All the extra penalties this year rewarded the bigger packs, though it still didn't help the Cowboys.
There's no such thing as a favourable draw unless you're better than most teams.
Yeah what a massive stroke of luck to have less injuries. It's like having a favourable draw FFS!
Here's the ladder and the number of players to appear in 20+ games this year:
15 Roosters
11 Storm
13 Souths
10 Sharks
13 Broncos
10 Panthers
15 Dragons
13 Warriors
9 Tigers
11 Raiders
11 Knights
10 Dogs
10 Cowboys
10 Titans
8 Manly
6 Eels
So were we lucky last year (we had ten blokes play 20+ games) or unlucky this year?
Who are the two big forwards? Lane is no bigger than Evans, and Vave isn't much smaller than Paulo.
Ferguson addresses our biggest weakness, but Hayne could also have done a great job on the wing this year if he hadn't missed so many games.
If our halves had played as well as last year (behind the same pack) we would've won the possession count a lot more. Our forwards would have been big enough.
No such thing as a favourable draw? Now I've heard everything. I couldn't be bothered even arguing this one. Lets just say you are in fairyland or are just plain lying.
Yes as you yourself just pointed out we had almost twice as many players play 20+ games last year, so injuries did play a roll just like I said.
Like I have said on many occasions and you keep glossing over it to suit your argument, QUALITY big players is what I and others are referring to. Which you and the other negative posters know all to well, but love to sidestep. Evans and Vave...oh pleeease.
If our halves had played like last year? Yeah right. Halves only play well when a team wins the ruck. Big QUALITY forwards win the ruck or powerful fast backs. Our forwards lost their Zip this year. We can argue over the reasons forever, but mine they lost it for the reasons I have already stated, plus ultimately I blame the coach for not recruiting quality size. He should of anticipated that they had been playing out of their skin to dominate and win the ruck going on 2 plus years and maybe something like this season was around the corner.
I believe that he should have been addressing the quality, powerful player from the day he arrived, but really didn't. He kept looking for budget players and yes sometimes they come off, like Brown, who I for one always thought was quality and was stoked Souths dropped the ball on. But ultimately you get what you pay for.
The best recruiters are the best coaches long term. BA has been a mixed bag and therefore the results are the same.