I reckon as far as it goes the NRL can make up whatever f**king rules they like, but, and it's a big but, the problem with this lot is that it's reactive and retrospective.
It's too late for them to avoid being reactive, but in doing so they should recognise that there is an element of injustice to apply a rule retrospectively.
For sure, set a rule that says if you do whatever, then bam , that's a paddlin' but from now on.
The rules that should apply to the JDB and Walker cases should be whatever policy they had in place at the time of the alleged offence. Not whatever policy they decide to make in the future.
I'm no expert, but I'm fairly certain a contract that stipulates that if you do an action that causes a break in a clause of the contract, we will be free to make up whatever the f**k rule and punishment we like, would not pass muster if challenged.
.