What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Eelementary

Post Whore
Messages
57,257
Yeah he was still the better player but the gap would be nothing compared to Sivo and current Fergo. And it’s not just his ability to find try line (cause clearly Sivo knows how to do that too just not as fancily), Fergos all around awareness in games and understanding of the sport is in the upper echelons of all players.

I heart Fergo.
 

lingard

Coach
Messages
11,427
Define gun player. Because my thoughts are your view is probably limited to the likes of Tedesco, Turdston and #CAMshafted and that the “gun” players are limited to spine positions where there are only 4 in a team. To which I counter with Hayne.
If I’m wrong and you can provide a better detailed definition of gun players that includes forwards and backline then I’d counter with Semi and the list that Barry already provided

You'd be dead wrong, then. And find you're own f**king definition, dipstick.
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,870
That's a bit rude.

Luckily I know 84s definition of dipstick is an absolutely glowing compliment
Na dipstick was absolutely warranted given I was so obviously attacking him personally and not simply questioning his post
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,870
Over a ten year period, that's not many, is it? Which was my point.
Well given so many ill defined parameters, it’s tough to know if 3 is enough, or if the number is even 3.

It’d be like having a bunch of notches on a dipstick and putting it in a random tank blindly, checking the level and making determination just based on the dipstick
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,540
Na dipstick was absolutely warranted given I was so obviously attacking him personally and not simply questioning his post

Nah lingard wouldn't do that.

Not after the way he bollocked me for it. He was right to do it, even though I was replying to a post attacking my missus or whatever, one should never call people names under any circumstances.

So dipstick must be a compliment. You f**ken dipstick
 

lingard

Coach
Messages
11,427
Na dipstick was absolutely warranted given I was so obviously attacking him personally and not simply questioning his post

You've always attacked me personally. And I don't think you've ever agreed with anything I've ever said. So I don't know why you bother responding to my posts. What's the point? It's like some sort of recorded message.
 

lingard

Coach
Messages
11,427
Nah lingard wouldn't do that.

Not after the way he bollocked me for it. He was right to do it, even though I was replying to a post attacking my missus or whatever, one should never call people names under any circumstances.

So dipstick must be a compliment. You f**ken dipstick

Attacking your missus or whatever? You reckon you don't even remember it. And you know full-well that Gleneel was not attacking your missus. And you know full-well that I was not supporting his attacking of your missus "or something". You were so high on attacking 'deathriders' (anyone who put forward any sort of negative comments about poor old B.A.) that you completely lost sight of the fact that you were (note the past-tense) the most vindictive and caustic arsehole on this forum. Anyway, that's in the past now, isn't it? - since your claim that you can't even remember what the supposed insult was about.
 

lingard

Coach
Messages
11,427
Well given so many ill defined parameters, it’s tough to know if 3 is enough, or if the number is even 3.

It’d be like having a bunch of notches on a dipstick and putting it in a random tank blindly, checking the level and making determination just based on the dipstick

Well, mate, do you have a definition for 'gun players'? And do you disagree that we haven't developed and kept very many in the last 20 years? Hindy's original comment was that we hadn't developed very many 'gun' backs. I agreed and carried it a step further by including forwards as well. Do you disagree? Do you even have an opinion?
 
Top