Only because it was subsidized by him being on "overs" at Riff.
And that's the point, that subsidies gone, so with it goes the ability to pay him "unders".
So the question becomes is he value at circa 700k, 'cause that's his reported earnings, and will he be value at that price moving forward and for how many years?
All I'm saying is that in re-signing or replacing him that 500k isn't the number we're dealing with, it's the 700k he's being paid, and expecting to replace his output at the 500k we've been forking out isn't realistic if you consider having him at that number to be "unders".