What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Messages
19,393
You don’t need a clause necessarily. There is precedent when an employer makes a false or misleading pre-contract assurance or warranty to incentivise you to accept an offer. Repudiation by employer is grounds for termination.

It would be very odd for a club to promise that they wouldn't fire the coach, or to say we won't enforce the contract if we do. If you want to make that promise, then you put it in the contract. This is an assurance that is 100% contractable, so if you want to include it you do so. It's not like a subjective promise to 'improve the depth of the back line'.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,719
No, @Wally21 stated a few thoughts of his own. You know, like he had an opinion. You weren't even mentioned.
The bolded sentence of yours is poor form.

Nah they were all linked. My point was that nobody in this thread has said at any stage that “just making the semis is enough”. Yet he and others claims that there is. If there is, then I’d like to see it.

Wally —> “It’s depressing reading this thread and realizing so many of our supporters believe making the top 4 or top 8 for a few years is the definition of success.”


1DEC0070-3EBD-40DB-85DE-049E4E7C70AC.jpeg692C4EF4-2B58-4E95-B69E-091A6DB91CB1.jpegF1E35FC6-C14F-4C5F-B2A1-6619D5481C57.jpeg
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,748
It would be very odd for a club to promise that they wouldn't fire the coach, or to say we won't enforce the contract if we do. If you want to make that promise, then you put it in the contract. This is an assurance that is 100% contractable, so if you want to include it you do so. It's not like a subjective promise to 'improve the depth of the back line'.
I think the plausible scenario would be Papali’i seeking that assurance, Wigers giving it to him without thought to legality surrounding doing so and then excluded it from contract, intentionally or not and Papali’i either hasn’t picked it up or wilfully overlooked it because he already had assurance/best money available.

I think realistically he never sought any assurances and just took the best offer. The talk about reneging either comes from us telling him we’ve found a bit more in budget and Wigers are basketcase OR possibly the Wigers with their changes deciding they no longer value him at the same amount.
OR EVEN MORE LIKELY it’s just been made up by media.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,872
Nah they were all linked. My point was that nobody in this thread has said at any stage that “just making the semis is enough”. Yet he and others claims that there is. If there is, then I’d like to see it.

Wally —> “It’s depressing reading this thread and realizing so many of our supporters believe making the top 4 or top 8 for a few years is the definition of success.”


View attachment 63776View attachment 63778View attachment 63777

Do you come with a switch? If so press this button.

images (14).jpeg
 

Latest posts

Top