Rumours and Stuff

[Incorrect]

who???

If it ain't obvious to you now, maybe it will be eventually but personally speaking I need to do something different and so I will take Mr Bandwagon's advice on board and just pretend the offender is like TheRam, I never could manage to bring myself to read all of his content... Still miss him though....

 

[Bandwagon]

The vultures are circling. Time for some siege mentality. Let’s go Parra, stick it up these merkins.

I reckon it's more Fox doing Fox things and blowing shit up to create a bit of drama, they know there's plenty of merkins out there that'll lap up their 1 + 1 = 3 shit, despite the article containing the following disclaimer

There is no suggestion in the briefing document obtained by Fox Sports that the claim of nepotism relates to coach Brad Arthur or his son Jakob, who has been selected to play off the bench against the Raiders on Friday.

I mean even the wording there is clearly designed to make sure the reader makes that connection at any rate, yet retain deniability.

But merkins will eat that shit up anyways.

 

[Twizzle]

Familiar face returning to coach NSW Cup and act as another assistant next year...

Caylo ?

 

[84 Baby]

Neither, we’re not confined to a prison cell at the moment.

I see… so it’s a big spoon/little spoon arrangement?

 

[Joshuatheeel]

Familiar face returning to coach NSW Cup and act as another assistant next year...

Cayless? Was reported in the media a week or so ago

 

[Bandwagon]

If it ain't obvious to you now, maybe it will be eventually but personally speaking I need to do something different and so I will take Mr Bandwagon's advice on board and just pretend the offender is like TheRam, I never could manage to bring myself to read all of his content... Still miss him though....

I'd read The Rams first and last paragraphs, Idea, summation, skip all the fluff and filler. Much better for mine.

 

[Incorrect]

I'd read The Rams first and last paragraphs, Idea, summation, skip all the fluff and filler. Much better for mine.

I had a different approach - when I saw his name, I'd scroll down to see how long it was.... If I had to swipe 3+ times I just kept going and would move to the next post....

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Depending upon how you want to define it any player could be the difference in a close game, but that's a bit different from the idea that leaving any given player out could cost us the game. Of course by whatever definition it's also very possible the inclusion of any given player could cost us the game, it's a pretty silly metric to attempt TBH.

Because the implication there is that they basically demand selection, which you could say for those players I mentioned, but not for a player such as Cartwright.

Again I'd rather another forward on the bench, but I just don't reckon Cartwright is the player you have to have in our squad, I'd have an injured Nrown ahead of him, as long as he wasn't Black Knight type injured.

It's pretty simple to me. The team is better with Cartwright in for Arthur, easily enough that it could change the outcome. And it would be better still with Nrown in for Maka.

 

[84 Baby]

I'd read The Rams first and last paragraphs, Idea, summation, skip all the fluff and filler. Much better for mine.

You’re a mod? Aren’t you meant to read bandy is a cuck all of the post?
I mean someone could easily hide something in the middle of a post

 

[Twizzle]

I took up speed reading to get through them

 

[Bandwagon]

I had a different approach - when I saw his name, I'd scroll down to see how long it was.... If I had to swipe 3+ times I just kept going and would move to the next post....

Yeah, that'd also work.

 

[IFR33K]

mods have to read your dribble so it works both ways

At least there’s merit to my dribble. He’s still trying to justify the ja selection, and will argue with anyone that has a differing opinion to him. On any matter.

have a good night!

 

[Bandwagon]

You’re a mod? Aren’t you meant to read bandy is a cuck all of the post?
I mean someone could easily hide something in the middle of a post

Not in this forum I aint.

 

[Incorrect]

You’re a mod? Aren’t you meant to read bandy is a cuck all of the post?
I mean someone could easily hide something in the middle of a post

Ram could have hid an elephant in the middle of one of his posts!!

 

[IFR33K]

I'd read The Rams first and last paragraphs, Idea, summation, skip all the fluff and filler. Much better for mine.

FMD he loved a long post.

 

[Bandwagon]

It's pretty simple to me. The team is better with Cartwright in for Arthur, easily enough that it could change the outcome. And it would be better still with Nrown in for Maka.

That's fine, but it's not the same idea.

 

[Twizzle]

At least there’s merit to my dribble

in your opinion maybe, as monotonous and repetitive as it is

He’s still trying to justify the ja selection, and will argue with anyone that has a differing opinion to him. On any matter.

mods are members primarily and also volunteer to moderate LU, and like everyone else here they are entitled to their opinions

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

That's fine, but it's not the same idea.

Yes it is.

 

[Bandwagon]

FMD he loved a long post.

He sure does.

I think often times it was detrimental to communicating the idea or point, which could otherwise offer more than the sum of it's parts.

 

[Bandwagon]

Yes it is.

As convincing as that argument might seem, I'll sum up my rebuttal to as few words as possible...

No it isn't.