Tiger5150
Bench
- Messages
- 3,717
No, he signed because the Tigers reduced their offer to four years.
Whatever gets Pou through the night....
I know for a fact they never offered 5 years, but dont expect you to believe me.
No, he signed because the Tigers reduced their offer to four years.
Whatever gets Pou through the night....
I know for a fact they never offered 5 years, but dont expect you to believe me.
It will be interesting when we extend hopgood.He had two other interested parties, but if we were willing to match rival offers we would have done it weeks ago. This latest article by Chammas is leaked by the Tigers, so is intended to suit their narrative. Suddenly they were only offering an extra $200k over the same duration as Parra? It doesn't make sense. All the kerfuffle a week ago was over the extra year on offer at Wests. That's the only thing that would sway Moses to leave, and they would have known it. This Chammas article is Tigers sour grapes, nothing more. We know Parra doesn't pay overs because we have a good team. Now if only we could get a few more merkins on unders we could compete with Penrith, Melbourne and the Roosters.
I was being facetious. Just saying while Suaalii could be a poor influence, so could Cobbo & Koula.Well many religious people don't beleive in dinosaurs. But I think most do believe that GAYS exist.
But the media reported they offered 5 years?Whatever gets Pou through the night....
I know for a fact they never offered 5 years, but dont expect you to believe me.
Id sign up for 9th at this stage.I hope the Tigers make the top 8. I don't mind them.
I was being facetious. Just saying while Suaalii could be a poor influence, so could Cobbo & Koula.
Koula would be great but if Waqa left
But the media reported they offered 5 years?
“I know for a fact…”Actually, there is a caveat, that could explain the 4/5 year thing. Tigers only offered him a contract for 4 years from 2024, but at the same stage (when they thought their offer was $300Kpa more than Parra and feeling good about themselves) Tigers and Moses were talking about 2023. That could be the 5th year.
Where do you spend the difference but? Or are you assuming we already have?I don't see Manly letting him go. I also think we might sign Waqa back up on a cheaper deal. Waqa are 300k would be fine in my eyes.
“I know for a fact…”
We should be a stronger team than Melbourne this season.He had two other interested parties, but if we were willing to match rival offers we would have done it weeks ago. This latest article by Chammas is leaked by the Tigers, so is intended to suit their narrative. Suddenly they were only offering an extra $200k over the same duration as Parra? It doesn't make sense. All the kerfuffle a week ago was over the extra year on offer at Wests. That's the only thing that would sway Moses to leave, and they would have known it. This Chammas article is Tigers sour grapes, nothing more. We know Parra doesn't pay overs because we have a good team. Now if only we could get a few more merkins on unders we could compete with Penrith, Melbourne and the Roosters.
I do know for a fact from the best source (what you do with it is up to you) that Tigers offer was 4 years from 2024. I know for a fact that Sheen was investigating Moses for 2023. The rest is speculation on my part.
Only because you merkins are sporting plugs, Gary has just bought a fetching new hair hat.not all our fans have solar panels on their roof
Where do you spend the difference but? Or are you assuming we already have?
Do we believe the media or not? I vote not. They are all speculators. We know we don't pay overs because we have a much stronger squad than back when we did pay overs. It's also stronger than other clubs that pay overs, such as Wests and Canterbury. I obviously don't know the facts, but if they're not paying overs why are they so shit?But the media reported they offered 5 years?
Possibly, but only because they are rebuilding. Over the long term I expect them to continue outperforming us and everyone else, including the Panthers.We should be a stronger team than Melbourne this season.
Pfft @Tiger5150 knows for a fact the media made up the 5 year Tigers offer, but they definitely didn’t make up the $1.25m/year Eels offerDo we believe the media or not? I vote not. They are all speculators. We know we don't pay overs because we have a much stronger squad than back when we did pay overs. It's also stronger than other clubs that pay overs, such as Wests and Canterbury. I obviously don't know the facts, but if they're not paying overs why are they so shit?
For NSW Cup maybe? He no longer merits a starting 13 position in any new contract.I don't see Manly letting him go. I also think we might sign Waqa back up on a cheaper deal. Waqa are 300k would be fine in my eyes.