Rumours and Stuff

[the phantom menace]

Twice Ive asked him to clarify that two guys punching /slapping each other on a field is the same the same guy doing it to his wife at home and he has doubled down. I dont know how else to take it.

Yes, Pou's had his chances to recant - or align his view to that which Lingard generous interprets it as...

 

[Tiger5150]

View attachment 81842

Correct me?

Yes I will continue to correct you until that comprehension kicks in.

Like I said Russell Packer James Roberts.

Yes you did. you've said it a few times. Not sure why. I clearly said I would turn in my membership if the Tigers signed a player convicted of violence against a woman. Which of those two was convicted of violence against a woman?.

The NRL signed registered both of their contracts.

Let me know when you hand in your membership.

As soon as the Tigers sign a convicted woman basher, I will. Luckily havent had to yet.

Do you really want to keep doing this?

 

[lingard]

Not quite what Pou said.

He seemed to be playing the contrarian and doing just so. He hasn't disputed that, despite being called out by various forum members (including ones he wouldn't have on ignore - or didn't at the time).

Opinions, or unsourced bullshit (as a mod put it), not facts.

I personally think Pou's form and posting (trolling) history merits it, and wasn't robinson crusoe in calling him out.

You're entitled to disagree of course (generally or on the specific issue), but the way you (perhaps subconsciously) chose to on this occasion borders on following in Pou's trolling footsteps.

Pou's not the only one you try to besmirch, though, is he? You obsess about others too. You've got a bit of a history, haven't you? And now you are saying that I am bordering on being a troll. Because I'm agreeing with Pou on this issue? So now anyone who agrees with Pou is now branded and categorised, are they? You're funny.

 

[JokerEel]

I didnt. I clearly said my red line was violence against women. I have been entirely consistent.

No need thankfully.

No you will just stoop as low and support a club that signed Russel Packer...

https://www.nospam47.com/au/feature...ign-russell-packer/18be0hwkwpzl018su6gboxioji

 

[JokerEel]

Yes I will continue to correct you until that comprehension kicks in.

Yes you did. you've said it a few times. Not sure why. I clearly said I would turn in my membership if the Tigers signed a player convicted of violence against a woman. Which of those two was convicted of violence against a woman?.

As soon as the Tigers sign a convicted woman basher, I will. Luckily havent had to yet.

Do you really want to keep doing this?

Why do you keep changing your wording?

James Roberts Abused women your club happily signed him.

 

[the phantom menace]

Pou's not the only one you try to besmirch, though, is he?

I think he pretty much is, to be honest .

You obsess about others too. You've got a bit of a history, haven't you?

Not really - I just call out stupid posts when I see them. Some other people may have had a run (or thought they were being personally besmirched), but any criticisms are usually balanced by "likes" of their sensible posts. That applies to you (for example), and people like Suity and Emjaycee (who have at times have attempted to go chasing me) will attest they receive plenty of likes from me on here too.

And now you are saying that I am bordering on being a troll. Because I'm agreeing with Pou on this issue? So now anyone who agrees with Pou is now branded and categorised, are they? You're funny.

Please re-read the previous comments for increased understanding - it's the way you're choosing to try and single out my criticism of Pou's current contrarian misogyny (with attempts at personal comments etc) which - imo - means you're bordering on Pou trolldom. Simples.

 

[Tiger5150]

Why do you keep changing your wording?

Got nothing to do with employers. I would personally hand in my membership. I could not support my club signing, paying and YES supporting someone guilty of violence against women. YMMV.

I havent changed my wording once, your comprehension simply so bad that you are only now just slowing coming around to what Ive been saying from the start, consistently.

James Roberts Abused women your club happily signed him.

Allegedly yelled at a woman, charged with drunk and disorderly. Never guilty of violence against a woman.

how many more times do we need to go around and around?

 

[JokerEel]

I havent changed my wording once, your comprehension simply so bad that you are only now just slowing coming around to what Ive been saying from the start, consistently.

Allegedly yelled at a woman, charged with drunk and disorderly. Never guilty of violence against a woman.

how many more times do we need to go around and around?

You have changed it multiples.

James Robert Abused a women signed by the Tigers..

NRL registered contracts for men who abused women. Why haven't you handed in your membership yet?

Hand in that membership yet?

 

[Tiger5150]

You have changed it multiples.

You are seriously boring everyone here and i dont think you are looking like the white knight you think you are. I havent changed my stance once. Please feel free to point any out. Been clear since my original post, which I pasted above. Still consistent but you cant let it go because you promised to chase me out but are wrong. My advice, is to just let it go....Im happy to.

James Robert Abused a women signed by the Tigers..

and yet never charged or convicted of violence to women.

NRL registered contracts for men who abused women.

Clearly, Kirisome Au'va played two years for Parra after conviction.

Why haven't you handed in your membership yet?

Because thankfully, I havent had a need to. Are you going keep this up? its embarrassing.

 

[JokerEel]

You are seriously boring everyone here and i dont think you are looking like the white knight you think you are. I havent changed my stance once. Please feel free to point any out. Been clear since my original post, which I pasted above. Still consistent but you cant let it go because you promised to chase me out but are wrong. My advice, is to just let it go....Im happy to.

and yet never charged or convicted of violence to women.


Clearly, Kirisome Au'va played two years for Parra after conviction.

Because thankfully, I havent had a need to. Are you going keep this up? its embarrassing.

So if he was charged then you will hand in your membership?

NRL registered these contracts so yes you pay to watch them play.

 

[JokerEel]

No you will just stoop as low and support a club that signed Russel Packer...

View attachment 81843

https://www.nospam47.com/au/feature...ign-russell-packer/18be0hwkwpzl018su6gboxioji

 

[Tiger5150]

So if he was charged then you will hand in your membership?

NRL registered these contracts so yes you pay to watch them play.

Mate, lets do this slowly......here is the post that I made....

Got nothing to do with employers. I would personally hand in my membership. I could not support my club signing, paying and YES supporting someone guilty of violence against women. YMMV.

If James Roberts was charged and found guilty of violence against women, and then the Tigers knowingly signed him and played him, yes I would personally hand in my membership. Another example is if they had not sacked Robert Lui.

Ill pre-empt you and hopefully save all of us some bandwidth. If James Roberts is charged and convicted of something after the Tigers got rid of him, no I will not be handing in my membership.

 

[Tiger5150]

What is your point about Russell Packer?

 

[JokerEel]

Mate, lets do this slowly......here is the post that I made....



If James Roberts was charged and found guilty of violence against women, and then the Tigers knowingly signed him and played him, yes I would personally hand in my membership. Another example is if they had not sacked Robert Lui.

Ill pre-empt you and hopefully save all of us some bandwidth. If James Roberts is charged and convicted of something after the Tigers got rid of him, no I will not be handing in my membership.

and Or?

 

[JokerEel]

What is your point about Russell Packer?

Pretty straight forward..

Your grub of a club signed him after he bashed someone and was sent to jail for it.

I guess that victim doesn't matter though as he isnt a woman.

 

[Tiger5150]

View attachment 81846


and Or?

What the hell are you going on about? Seriously this is stinking the thread up and you are going around in circles. As I have posted 3 or 4 times now, I clearly said I would hand in my membership if the Tigers signed a convicted woman basher....then I reiterate that in the screenshot you just posted where I said that if the Tigers stooped as low as to sign an Au'va, a self admitted and convicted woman basher, I would hand my membership in. Totally consistent. What is it you are not getting?

Russell Packer is a shit bloke, turned out to be a shit player as well. I didnt like and wasnt proud of having him at the club but I could not have been clearer that violence against women is the red line that I would not cross with regards supporting a player or club.

Seriously mate, Ive been a clear and consistent as I can, there is no "gotcha" there and IMO you are looking a bit silly chasing this in circles. Give it up.

 

[Tiger5150]

Pretty straight forward..

Your grub of a club signed him after he bashed someone and was sent to jail for it.

I guess that victim doesn't matter though as he isnt a woman.

Packers victim totally matters. Packer went to gaol and had to pay his victim $300K. Was a disgusting attack. Wasnt proud of having Packer at the club.

As I have clearly stated over and over and over....the red line that I would not cross and could not support my club would be signing someone convicted of violence against women. YMMV. Not sure how to make it clearer.

 

[JokerEel]

Fantastic so can I go back to not wanting anyone playing in the NRL who has committed violent crimes against men and women now and supporting my Club or is that not ok by you.

Oh wait I couldn't give a f**k what you think

 

[Tiger5150]

Fantastic so can I go back to not wanting anyone playing in the NRL who has committed violent crimes against men and women now and supporting my Club or is that not ok by you.

Oh wait I couldn't give a f**k what you think

Oh thank god.

 

[Tooooks]

Mate, comprehension is not a strength of yours. James Roberts was never charged let alone convicted of pulling a womans hair and yelling at someone is not violence.

How pathetic would you have to be to make shit like this up to clear your own conscience?

He was never charged with pulling that woman’s hair because she never reported it to police, who would’ve got the nightclub footage. The NRL investigated, tried to get the footage and were told to bugger off. Therefore, insufficient evidence.

Anyway mate, to be honest you’re at the point where you’re now stinking up the forum, so I’ll put you on ignore. Maybe head over to the real wests tigers forum (not the LU one) which is quite a busy one.