Tiger5150
Bench
- Messages
- 3,759
Depends on how many false equivalences Joker can pull out of his butt....Im still waiting for Russell Packer.I hope this goes on for another 10 pages or so. Riveting!
Depends on how many false equivalences Joker can pull out of his butt....Im still waiting for Russell Packer.I hope this goes on for another 10 pages or so. Riveting!
Violence is more in men's nature than women's. And, yes, some women are attracted to that (for varying reasons). And, yes, there are more male victims of violence (not d/v, obviously; but violence in general). Pou was not at any time condoning males perpetrating violence against women. But you already knew that. He was just stating some facts. But you already knew that. You are very quick to assassinate people's characters on here, mate.Pou started by claiming/generalising that violence is in men's nature, and that he thinks many people including some women find that attractive . Talk about excuse finding for any past male misbehaviours...
He Pou said there were more male victims of violence than female, which was called out by a mod as unsourced bullshit, with evidence provided to the contrary.
A few stumbles later and he's tied himself in mysogynistic circles, along with one person who chose to double down with him. I take solace that as we all grow older, our kids and grandkids will see through these ancient viewpoints around this that haven't evolved since the 1950s, and such discredited views will die out.
Oh dear.
I think I'll retain my right to disagree, where he often is simplistically generalisingly wrong. Interesting you chose to respond to me about this instead of the various others here who've also called out Pou's errors on this topic...
So an avid believer in the tripe that is Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, then?
You can go in the same category of person as Pou then
Depends on how many false equivalences
Joker can pull out of his butt....Im still waiting for Russell Packer.
Tigers signed James Roberts after accusations (no charges or conviction) of yelling at a woman. Parramatta signed Kirisome Au'va after he plead guilty and was convicted of Assault, recklessly causing injury and criminal damage after bashing his girlfriend and swinging her into a wall. One of these things is not like the other.
James Roberts is currently defending charges of intimidating (not actual violence) his wife after Tigers let him go.
I love it that you came in here beating your chest that you wouldnt stand for violence against women and yet forked out money to watch Kirisome Au'va play for your beloved Parra. Thats what started this diversion and you are perpetuating it by grasping at pathetic false equivalences to assuage your conscience. How is it going for you?
I think I’d rather we signed Hodgson again to play rather than read more of this sh1t.
No, they signed a self admitted, convicted woman basher and you paid to watch him represent your club.My club didn't sign James Roberts.
Mate....Im done stinking this thread up.What did Russell Packer do?
No, they signed a self admitted, convicted woman basher and you paid to watch him represent your club.
Mate....Im done stinking this thread up.
All I did was call you out your virtue signalling with your brave statement that all men who are violent to women should be banned, whilst you paid to support Parra with Kirisome Au'va....end of story. Despite your efforts, Tigers havent signed or played a player guilty of violence against a woman. We have had plenty of dickheads but not that.
There really isnt anything else to discuss. Tigers are shit, Parra more successful but with regards to supporting convicted woman bashers, I think we have reached the end of the discussion dont you?
Feel free to point out the hypocrisy and Ill correct it. This discussion started with you bravely making a stand on violence against women. Pou pointed out (to me) that its a violent game played by violent men and I quite clearly said that that is a given but the red line I would not cross is supporting a player who has committed violence against a woman.C'mon man I ain't stopping until this guy f**ks back off to his hypocritical hole.
I reckon he was being just a tiny bit sarcastic, don't you? Just a tad ? Just a smidgen? A response to politically correct f#cwits who just love to get outraged by anything that doesn't toe the party line. Or perhaps a reaction to the incessant character assassination of thatLiterally saying, in his version of english, that it makes no difference if its a man or woman on the end of male violence.
Not quite what Pou said.Violence is more in men's nature than women's.
He seemed to be playing the contrarian and doing just so. He hasn't disputed that, despite being called out by various forum members (including ones he wouldn't have on ignore - or didn't at the time).Pou was not at any time condoning males perpetrating violence against women.
Opinions, or unsourced bullshit (as a mod put it), not facts.He was just stating some facts.
I personally think Pou's form and posting (trolling) history merits it, and wasn't robinson crusoe in calling him out.You are very quick to assassinate people's characters on here, mate.
Which one of them was convicted of violence against women?So Russel Packer? James Roberts.
Ok....Ill continue to correct you and stink this thread up until you learn comprehension. I said, in english that the red line I would not cross is supporting a player convicted of violence against women. Please re-read that a few times before continuing to stink this thread up for your mates.Iam still calling out your virtue Signalling.
Going to do it till you f**k back off to whatever hole you came from.
No need thankfully.Handing in your membership yet Mr Virtual Signaller?
Feel free to point out the hypocrisy and Ill correct it. This discussion started with bravely making a stand on violence against women. Pou pointed out (to me) that its a violent game played by violent men and I quite clearly said that that is a given but the red line I would not cross is supporting a player who has committed violence against a woman.
Which one of them was convicted of violence against women?
Ok....Ill continue to correct you and stink this thread up until you learn comprehension. I said, in english that the red line I would not cross is supporting a player convicted of violence against women. Please re-read that a few times before continuing to stink this thread up for your mates.
No need thankfully.
Not really, I just think he posts like a troll on the forums, and enjoy calling his ways out for the pure sport of it.1. The reason I chose to respond to you is that you are an obsessive and serial character assassinator, whose current fixation is Pou. You have become so blinded by your obsession to prove him to be wrong, that you routinely overlook the many times he's right.
Given you started by trying to challenge or assassinate mine (see your above point 1. for a further example), I thought I'd return the favour.2. No, I've never read the book. And are you going to try to assassinate my character, by guessing that I hold certain beliefs (that I probably dont).
Or no more, depending on which view point you take.3. So you are categorising me now, are you? And in the same category as Pou, no less.
Twice Ive asked him to clarify that two guys punching /slapping each other on a field is the same the same guy doing it to his wife at home and he has doubled down. I dont know how else to take it.I reckon he was being just a tiny bit sarcastic, don't you? Just a tad ? Just a smidgen?
Can't wait till the off season is over
No need thankfully.Russell Packer
Let me know when you hand in that membership